...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Selected maternal morbidities in women with a prior caesarean delivery planning vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean section: a retrospective cohort analysis using data from the UK Obstetric Surveillance System
【24h】

Selected maternal morbidities in women with a prior caesarean delivery planning vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean section: a retrospective cohort analysis using data from the UK Obstetric Surveillance System

机译:事先剖腹产,计划阴道分娩或选择性重复剖腹产的妇女的某些孕产妇发病率:使用英国产科监测系统的数据进行的回顾性队列分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To conduct a secondary analysis of data from the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS) to estimate the rates of specific maternal risks associated with planned vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) and elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS). Design A retrospective cohort analysis using UKOSS data from 4 studies conducted between 2005 and 2012. Setting All hospitals with consultant-led maternity units in the UK. Population Pregnant women who had a previous caesarean section. Method Women who had undergone a previous caesarean section were divided into 2 exposure groups: planned VBAC and ERCS. We calculated the incidence of each of the 4 outcomes of interest with 95% CIs for the 2 exposure groups using proxy denominators (total estimated VBAC and ERCS maternities in a given year). Incidences were compared between groups using χ2 test or Fisher's exact test and risk ratios with 95% CI. Main outcome measures Severe maternal morbidities: peripartum hysterectomy, severe sepsis, peripartum haemorrhage and failed tracheal intubation. Results The risks of all complications examined in both groups were low. The rates of peripartum hysterectomy, severe sepsis, peripartum haemorrhage and failed tracheal intubation were not significantly different between the 2 groups in absolute or relative terms. Conclusions While the risk of uterine rupture in the VBAC and ERCS groups is well understood, this national study did not demonstrate any other clear differences in the outcomes we examined. The absolute and relative risks of maternal complications were small in both groups. Large epidemiological studies could further help to assess whether the incidence of these rare outcomes would significantly differ between the VBAC and ERCS groups if a larger number of cases were to be examined. In the interim, this study provides important information to help pregnant women in their decision-making process.
机译:目的对英国产科监视系统(UKOSS)的数据进行二次分析,以评估与剖腹产(VBAC)和选择性重复剖腹产(ERCS)后计划中的阴道分娩相关的特定孕产妇风险率。设计使用2005年至2012年进行的4项研究的UKOSS数据进行的回顾性队列分析。在英国,所有医院均设有由顾问领导的产科部门。人口曾做过剖腹产手术的孕妇。方法将接受过剖腹产手术的女性分为两组:计划内VBAC和ERCS。我们使用代理分母(给定年份的估计VBAC和ERCS总成熟度)计算了4个相关结果中2个暴露组中95%CI的每一个的发生率。使用χ 2 检验或Fisher精确检验对两组之间的发病率进行比较,并采用95%CI进行风险比分析。主要预后指标严重的孕产妇发病:围产期子宫切除术,严重的败血症,围产期出血和气管插管失败。结果两组中所有并发症的风险均较低。两组的绝对或相对值在围产期子宫切除术,严重脓毒症,围产期出血和气管插管失败的发生率方面无显着差异。结论尽管对VBAC和ERCS组的子宫破裂风险已广为人知,但这项全国性研究并未证明我们检查的结局有任何其他明显差异。两组中产妇并发症的绝对和相对风险均很小。大型的流行病学研究可以进一步帮助评估,如果要检查的病例更多,VBAC组和ERCS组之间这些罕见结局的发生率是否会有显着差异。在此期间,这项研究提供了重要的信息,以帮助孕妇进行决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号