首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Validation of the Polish version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in patients with osteoarthritis undergoing total knee replacement
【24h】

Validation of the Polish version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in patients with osteoarthritis undergoing total knee replacement

机译:波兰语版本的膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)在接受全膝关节置换术的骨关节炎患者中的验证

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To test the clinimetric properties and to evaluate the internal consistency, validity and reliability of the Polish version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in older patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis undergoing total knee replacement (TKR). Design and setting A prospective cohort study performed at the university hospital and the outpatient clinic. Methods The patients were asked to complete the KOOS questionnaire and the Short Form 36 Health Survey. We evaluated floor/ceiling effects, reliability (using Cronbach's α, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and measurement error), structural validity (performing exploratory principal factor analysis), construct validity (with the use of 3 a priori hypotheses) and responsiveness (using data obtained before and after the surgery, and described by Global Perceived Effect, effect size and standardised response mean). Results The study consisted of 68 participants (mean age 68.8, 82% women). The floor effects were found prior to surgery for the subscales Sports and Recreation Function, and Quality of Life. The Cronbach's α was from 0.90 to 0.92 for all subscales, indicating excellent internal consistency. The test–retest reliability at follow-up was excellent, with ICCs ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 for all KOOS subscales. The minimal detectable change ranged from 18.2 to 24.3 on an individual level and from 2.4 to 2.9 on a group level. All KOOS items were relevant, and all a priori established hypotheses were supported. Responsiveness was confirmed with a statistically significant correlation between all KOOS subscales and the Global Perceived Effect score (ranging from 0.56 to 0.70, p0.001). Conclusions The Polish version of KOOS demonstrated good reliability, validity and responsiveness for use in patient groups that had undergone TKR. Since the smallest change considered clinically relevant cannot reliably be detected in individual cases, the Polish version of KOOS is advocated for assessment of groups of patients.
机译:目的测试波兰语版本的全膝关节置换术(TKR)终末期膝骨关节炎患者的膝关节损伤和骨关节炎和波兰关节炎结果评分(KOOS)的波兰语版本的斜度特性并评估其内部一致性,有效性和可靠性。设计和设置在大学医院和门诊部进行的前瞻性队列研究。方法要求患者填写KOOS调查表和36型健康简表。我们评估了地面/天花板效应,可靠性(使用Cronbach'sα,类内相关系数(ICC)和测量误差),结构有效性(执行探索性主因子分析),构造有效性(使用3个先验假设)和响应能力(使用手术前后获得的数据,并以“整体感知效果”,“效果大小”和“标准化反应平均值”描述)。结果该研究由68名参与者组成(平均年龄68.8,女性占82%)。在手术前发现运动和娱乐功能和生活质量分量表的地面效应。所有分量表的Cronbach'sα为0.90至0.92,表明其内部一致性极好。随访时的重测信度极好,所有KOOS分量表的ICC范围为0.81至0.86。可检测到的最小变化在单个级别上从18.2到24.3,在组级别上从2.4到2.9。所有KOOS项目都是相关的,并且所有先验建立的假设均得到支持。在所有KOOS分量表和总体感知效果评分之间(0.56至0.70,p <0.001)在统计学上具有显着相关性,从而确认了反应能力。结论波兰语版本的KOOS具有良好的可靠性,有效性和响应性,适用于经历过TKR的患者群体。由于在个别情况下无法可靠地发现被认为与临床相关的最小变化,因此提倡使用波兰语版本的KOOS来评估患者群体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号