首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >A multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial, comparing high flow therapy with nasal continuous positive airway pressure as primary support for preterm infants with respiratory distress (the HIPSTER trial): study protocol
【24h】

A multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial, comparing high flow therapy with nasal continuous positive airway pressure as primary support for preterm infants with respiratory distress (the HIPSTER trial): study protocol

机译:一项多中心,随机对照,非劣效性试验,将高流量治疗与鼻连续气道正压通气作为呼吸窘迫早产儿的主要支持进行了比较(HIPSTER试验):研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction High flow (HF) therapy is an increasingly popular mode of non-invasive respiratory support for preterm infants. While there is now evidence to support the use of HF to reduce extubation failure, there have been no appropriately designed and powered studies to assess the use of HF as primary respiratory support soon after birth. Our hypothesis is that HF is non-inferior to the standard treatment—nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP)— as primary respiratory support for preterm infants. Methods and analysis The HIPSTER trial is an unblinded, international, multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Eligible infants are preterm infants of 28–36+6 weeks’ gestational age (GA) who require primary non-invasive respiratory support for respiratory distress in the first 24?h of life. Infants are randomised to treatment with either HF or NCPAP. The primary outcome is treatment failure within 72?h after randomisation, as determined by objective oxygenation, blood gas, and apnoea criteria, or the need for urgent intubation and mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of intubation, pneumothorax, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, nasal trauma, costs associated with hospital care and parental stress. With a specified non-inferiority margin of 10%, using a two-sided 95% CI and 90% power, the study requires 375 infants per group (total 750 infants). Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval has been granted by the relevant human research ethics committees at The Royal Women's Hospital (13/12), The Royal Children's Hospital (33144A), The Mercy Hospital for Women (R13/34), and the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (2013/1657). The trial is currently recruiting at 9 centres in Australia and Norway. The trial results will be published in peer-reviewed international journals, and presented at national and international conferences. Trial registration number Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ID: ACTRN12613000303741.
机译:简介高流量(HF)治疗是早产婴儿越来越流行的无创呼吸支持模式。虽然现在有证据支持使用HF来减少拔管失败,但尚无适当设计和强有力的研究来评估出生后不久将HF用作主要呼吸支持。我们的假设是,HF作为早产儿的主要呼吸支持,不劣于标准治疗-鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)。方法和分析HIPSTER试验是一项无盲,国际,多中心,随机,非劣效性试验。符合条件的婴儿是胎龄为28-36 +6 周的早产儿,他们在生命的最初24小时内需要主要的非侵入性呼吸支持来缓解呼吸窘迫。婴儿被随机分配接受HF或NCPAP治疗。主要结局是随机分配后72小时内的治疗失败,这取决于客观的氧合,血气和呼吸暂停标准,或者是否需要紧急插管和机械通气。次要结果包括气管插管,气胸,支气管肺发育不良,鼻外伤,与医院护理有关的费用和父母的压力。在指定的非劣势边际为10%的情况下,使用双面95%CI和90%功效,该研究每组需要375名婴儿(总共750名婴儿)。伦理与传播皇家妇女医院(13/12),皇家儿童医院(33144A),仁慈妇女医院(R13 / 34)和东南部的相关人类研究伦理委员会已经批准了伦理学挪威区域卫生局(2013/1657)。该试验目前正在澳大利亚和挪威的9个中心进行招募。试验结果将发表在同行评审的国际期刊上,并在国内和国际会议上发表。试验注册号澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心ID:ACTRN12613000303741。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号