首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Question design in nurse-led and GP-led telephone triage for same-day appointment requests: a comparative investigation
【24h】

Question design in nurse-led and GP-led telephone triage for same-day appointment requests: a comparative investigation

机译:由护士领导和全科医生领导的电话分类中针对当日约会请求的问题设计:比较调查

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective To compare doctors’ and nurses’ communication with patients in primary care telephone triage consultations. Design Qualitative comparative study of content and form of questions in 51 telephone triage encounters between practitioners (general practitioners (GPs)=29; nurses=22) and patients requesting a same-day appointment in primary care. Audio-recordings of nurse-led calls were synchronised with video recordings of nurse's use of computer decision support software (CDSS) during triage. Setting 2 GP practices in Devon and Warwickshire, UK. Participants 4 GPs and 29 patients; and 4 nurses and 22 patients requesting a same-day face-to-face appointment with a GP. Main outcome measure Form and content of practitioner-initiated questions and patient responses during clinical assessment. Results A total of 484 question–response sequences were coded (160 GP; 324 N). Despite average call lengths being similar (GP=4?min, 37?s, (SD=1?min, 26?s); N=4?min, 39?s, (SD=2?min, 22?s)), GPs and nurses differed in the average number (GP=5.51, (SD=4.66); N=14.72, (SD=6.42)), content and form of questions asked. A higher frequency of questioning in nurse-led triage was found to be due to nurses’ use of CDSS to guide telephone triage. 89% of nurse questions were oriented to asking patients about their reported symptoms or to wider-information gathering, compared to 54% of GP questions. 43% of GP questions involved eliciting patient concerns or expectations, and obtaining details of medical history, compared to 11% of nurse questions. Nurses using CDSS frequently delivered questions designed as declarative statements requesting confirmation and which typically preferred a ‘no problem’ response. In contrast, GPs asked a higher proportion of interrogative questions designed to request information. Conclusions Nurses and GPs emphasise different aspects of the clinical assessment process during telephone triage. These different styles of triage have implications for the type of information available following nurse-led or doctor-led triage, and for how patients experience triage.
机译:目的在初级保健电话分诊咨询中比较医生和护士与患者的交流。对执业医师(普通执业医师(GPs)= 29;护士= 22)与要求在基层医疗机构就诊的患者之间的51次电话分诊中问题的内容和形式的设计定性比较研究。在分诊期间,由护士主持的呼叫的音频记录与由护士使用计算机决策支持软件(CDSS)的视频记录同步。在英国德文郡和沃里克郡设置2种GP惯例。参与者4名全科医生和29名患者; 4名护士和22名患者要求当日与GP面对面预约。主要结局指标临床评估过程中从业人员提出的问题和患者反应的形式和内容。结果总共编码了484个问题-回答序列(160 GP; 324 N)。尽管平均通话时间相似(GP = 4?min,37?s,(SD = 1?min,26?s); N = 4?min,39?s,(SD = 2?min,22?s) ),全科医生和护士的平均人数(GP = 5.51,(SD = 4.66); N = 14.72,(SD = 6.42)),问题的内容和形式有所不同。发现在护士主导的分类中,提问的频率更高是由于护士使用CDSS指导电话分类。 89%的护士问题是针对询问患者所报告的症状或针对更广泛的信息收集,而全科医生的问题为54%。 GP问题中有43%涉及引起患者的关注或期望,并获得病史的详细信息,而护士问题中只有11%。使用CDSS的护士经常发出以声明式陈述形式设计,要求确认的问题,并且通常倾向于“没有问题”的回答。相比之下,GP提出了更多的询问信息的询问性问题。结论护士和全科医生强调在电话分诊期间临床评估过程的不同方面。这些不同的分诊方式对护士指导或医生指导的分诊后可获得的信息类型以及患者的分诊方式有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号