首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Introduction effects of the Australian plain packaging policy on adult smokers: a cross-sectional study
【24h】

Introduction effects of the Australian plain packaging policy on adult smokers: a cross-sectional study

机译:澳大利亚普通包装政策对成年吸烟者的介绍影响:一项横断面研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To determine whether smokers smoking from packs required under Australia's plain?packaging law had different smoking beliefs and quitting thoughts, compared with those still smoking from branded packs. Design Cross-sectional survey during the roll-out phase of the law, analysed by timing of survey. Setting Australian state of Victoria, November 2012. Participants 536 cigarette smokers with a usual brand, of whom 72.3% were smoking from a plain pack and 27.7% were smoking from a branded pack. Primary outcome measures Perceived quality and satisfaction of cigarettes compared with 1?year ago, frequency of thoughts of smoking harm, perceived exaggeration of harms, frequency of thoughts of quitting, quitting priority in life, intention to quit, approval of large graphic health warnings and plain packaging. Results Compared with branded pack smokers, those smoking from plain packs perceived their cigarettes to be lower in quality (adjusted OR (AdjOR)=1.66, p=0.045), tended to perceive their cigarettes as less satisfying than a year ago (AdjOR=1.70, p=0.052), were more likely to have thought about quitting at least once a day in the past week (AdjOR=1.81, p=0.013) and to rate quitting as a higher priority in their lives (F=13.11, df=1, p0.001). Plain pack smokers were more likely to support the policy than branded pack smokers (AdjOR=1.51, p=0.049). Branded and plain pack smokers did not differ on measures of less immediate smoking intentions, frequency of thoughts about harms or perceived exaggeration of harms. Appeal outcomes, but not other outcomes, were sensitive to the extent of roll-out, with responses from branded pack smokers approaching those of plain pack smokers, once 80% of survey respondents were smoking from plain packs 1–2?weeks before the December implementation date. Conclusions The early indication is that plain packaging is associated with lower smoking appeal, more support for the policy and more urgency to quit among adult smokers.
机译:目的确定与根据品牌包装吸烟的吸烟者相比,根据澳大利亚普通包装法要求使用包装吸烟的吸烟者是否具有不同的吸烟信念和戒烟思想。在法律推广阶段的设计横断面调查,通过调查时间进行分析。设在澳大利亚维多利亚州,2012年11月。参加者536名使用普通品牌的香烟吸烟者,其中72.3%的人使用普通包装吸烟,而27.7%的人使用品牌包装吸烟。主要结局指标与1年前相比,香烟的质量和满意度,吸烟危害的思想频度,危害的夸张感,戒烟的思想频度,戒除生活中的优先事项,戒烟的意愿,批准大量的图形健康警告和普通的包装。结果与品牌包装烟民相比,从普通包装烟民中抽烟的人认为他们的香烟质量较低(调整后OR(AdjOR)= 1.66,p = 0.045),他们的香烟满意度低于一年前(AdjOR = 1.70) ,p = 0.052),更有可能在过去一周内每天至少退出一次(AdjOR = 1.81,p = 0.013),并认为退出是他们生活中的重中之重(F = 13.11,df = 1,p <0.001)。普通烟民比品牌烟民更有可能支持该政策(AdjOR = 1.51,p = 0.049)。品牌烟民和普通烟民在减少立即吸烟意愿,对危害的想法发生频率或对危害的夸大程度等方面没有差异。上诉结果对推广的程度很敏感,但对其他结果却不敏感,在12月之前的80%的调查对象中,有品牌烟民的回答接近普通烟民的回答,而80%的受访者都从普通烟民中抽烟了。实施日期。结论早期迹象表明,普通包装与较低的吸烟吸引力,对政策的更多支持以及成年吸烟者戒烟的紧迫性有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号