首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Comparing safety climate for nurses working in operating theatres, critical care and ward areas in the UK: a mixed methods study
【24h】

Comparing safety climate for nurses working in operating theatres, critical care and ward areas in the UK: a mixed methods study

机译:比较英国手术室,重症监护室和病房区域的护士的安全环境:混合方法研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Objectives The main aim of the study was to explore the potential sources of variation and understand the meaning of safety climate for nursing practice in acute hospital settings in the UK. Design A sequential mixed methods design included a cross-sectional survey using the Safety Climate Questionnaire (SCQ) and thematic analysis of focus group discussions. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to validate the factor structure of the SCQ. Factor scores were compared between nurses working in operating theatres, critical care and ward areas. Results from the survey and the thematic analysis were then compared and synthesised. Setting A London University. Participants 319 registered nurses working in acute hospital settings completed the SCQ and a further 23 nurses participated in focus groups. Results CFA indicated that there was a good model fit on some criteria (???? 2 =1683.699, df=824, p<0.001; ???? 2 /df=2.04; root mean square error of approximation=0.058) but a less acceptable fit on comparative fit index which is 0.804. There was a statistically significant difference between clinical specialisms in management commitment (F (4,266)=4.66, p=0.001). Nurses working in operating theatres had lower scores compared with ward areas and they also reported negative perceptions about management in their focus group. There was significant variation in scores for communication across clinical specialism (F (4,266)=2.62, p=0.035) but none of the pairwise comparisons achieved statistical significance. Thematic analysis identified themes of human factors, clinical management and protecting patients. The system and the human side of caring was identified as a meta-theme. Conclusions The results suggest that the SCQ has some utility but requires further exploration. The findings indicate that safety in nursing practice is a complex interaction between safety systems and the social and interpersonal aspects of clinical practice.
机译:摘要目的本研究的主要目的是探讨潜在的变异来源,并了解英国急性医院环境中护理实践中安全气候的含义。设计顺序混合方法设计包括使用安全气候问卷(SCQ)进行的横断面调查以及对焦点小组讨论的主题分析。验证性因素分析(CFA)用于验证SCQ的因素结构。比较了在手术室,重症监护室和病房区域工作的护士的因子得分。然后将调查和主题分析的结果进行比较和综合。创办伦敦大学。参与者319位在急诊医院工作的注册护士完成了SCQ,另外23位护士参加了焦点小组。结果CFA表明在某些条件下模型拟合良好(???? 2 = 1683.699,df = 824,p <0.001; ???? 2 /df=2.04;均方根近似值= 0.058),但是相对拟合指数为0.804的拟合度较差。临床专家之间在管理承诺上有统计学上的显着差异(F(4,266)= 4.66,p = 0.001)。与病房区域相比,在手术室工作的护士得分较低,并且他们在其焦点小组中也对管理产生负面看法。跨临床专科的沟通得分存在显着差异(F(4,266)= 2.62,p = 0.035),但成对比较均无统计学意义。主题分析确定了人为因素,临床管理和保护患者的主题。系统和关怀的人性方面被确定为一个元主题。结论结果表明,SCQ具有一定的实用性,但需要进一步探索。研究结果表明,护理实践中的安全性是安全系统与临床实践的社会和人际方面之间的复杂相互作用。

著录项

  • 来源
    《BMJ Open》 |2017年第10期|共页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类 临床医学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号