首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Household survey analysis of the impact of comprehensive strategies to improve the expanded programme on immunisation at the county level in western China, 2006–2010
【24h】

Household survey analysis of the impact of comprehensive strategies to improve the expanded programme on immunisation at the county level in western China, 2006–2010

机译:家庭调查分析,2006-2010年中国西部县域全面战略对扩大免疫规划的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To evaluate interventions to improve routine vaccination coverage and caregiver knowledge in China's remote west, where routine immunisation is relatively weak. Design Prospective pre–post (2006–2010) evaluation in project counties; retrospective comparison based on 2004 administrative data at baseline and surveyed post-intervention (2010) data in selected non-project counties. Setting Four project counties and one non-project county in each of four provinces. Participants 3390 children in project counties at baseline, and 3299 in project and 830 in non-project counties post-intervention; and 3279 caregivers at baseline, and 3389 in project and 830 in non-project counties post-intervention. Intervention Multicomponent inexpensive knowledge-strengthening and service-strengthening and innovative, multisectoral engagement. Data collection Standard 30-cluster household surveys of vaccine coverage and caregiver interviews pre-intervention and post-intervention in each project county. Similar surveys in one non-project county selected by local authorities in each province post-intervention. Administrative data on vaccination coverage in non-project counties at baseline. Primary outcome measures Changes in vaccine coverage between baseline and project completion (2010); comparative caregiver knowledge in all counties in 2010. Analysis Crude (χ2) analysis of changes and differences in vaccination coverage and related knowledge. Multiple logistic regression to assess associations with timely coverage. Results Timely coverage of four routine vaccines increased by 21% (p0.001) and hepatitis B (HepB) birth dose by 35% (p0.001) over baseline in project counties. Comparison with non-project counties revealed secular improvement in most provinces, except new vaccine coverage was mostly higher in project counties. Ethnicity, province, birthplace, vaccination site, dual-parental out-migration and parental knowledge had significant associations with coverage. Knowledge increased for all variables but one in project counties (highest p0.05) and was substantially higher than in non-project counties (p0.01).
机译:目的评估在常规免疫力相对薄弱的偏远西部地区的干预措施,以提高常规疫苗接种率和护理人员知识。在项目县进行设计前评估(2006-2010);根据基线的2004年行政数据和选定非项目县的干预后(2010年)调查数据进行回顾性比较。在四个省中的每个州设置四个项目县和一个非项目县。干预后,项目县的3390名儿童,项目中的3299名儿童和非项目县的830名儿童;基线后为3279名护理人员,项目后为3389名,非项目县为830名。干预多要素,廉价的知识强化和服务强化以及创新的多部门参与。数据收集每个项目县的干预前和干预后,对疫苗覆盖率和看护者进行标准的30组家庭调查。干预后,每个省的地方当局选择在一个非项目县进行类似的调查。基线时非项目县疫苗接种覆盖率的行政数据。主要结果指标基线和项目完成之间疫苗覆盖率的变化(2010年);比较2010年所有县的看护者知识。Analysis Crude(χ 2 )分析疫苗接种覆盖率和相关知识的变化和差异。多元逻辑回归评估及时覆盖的关联。结果与项目县相比,四种常规疫苗的及时覆盖率比基线提高了21%(p <0.001),乙肝疫苗(HepB)的出生剂量提高了35%(p <0.001)。与非项目县的比较表明,大多数省的世俗状况有所改善,除了新疫苗的覆盖率在项目县中更高。种族,省份,出生地,疫苗接种地点,双亲外出和父母的知识与覆盖率有显着关联。在项目县中只有一个变量的所有变量的知识都增加了(最高p <0.05),并且大大高于非项目县(p <0.01)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号