首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical Internet research >The Deep Learning–Based Recommender System “Pubmender” for Choosing a Biomedical Publication Venue: Development and Validation Study
【24h】

The Deep Learning–Based Recommender System “Pubmender” for Choosing a Biomedical Publication Venue: Development and Validation Study

机译:基于深度学习的推荐系统“ Pubmender”,用于选择生物医学出版物的地点:开发和验证研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background It is of great importance for researchers to publish research results in high-quality journals. However, it is often challenging to choose the most suitable publication venue, given the exponential growth of journals and conferences. Although recommender systems have achieved success in promoting movies, music, and products, very few studies have explored recommendation of publication venues, especially for biomedical research. No recommender system exists that can specifically recommend journals in PubMed, the largest collection of biomedical literature. Objective We aimed to propose a publication recommender system, named Pubmender, to suggest suitable PubMed journals based on a paper’s abstract. Methods In Pubmender, pretrained word2vec was first used to construct the start-up feature space. Subsequently, a deep convolutional neural network was constructed to achieve a high-level representation of abstracts, and a fully connected softmax model was adopted to recommend the best journals. Results We collected 880,165 papers from 1130 journals in PubMed Central and extracted abstracts from these papers as an empirical dataset. We compared different recommendation models such as Cavnar-Trenkle on the Microsoft Academic Search (MAS) engine, a collaborative filtering–based recommender system for the digital library of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and CiteSeer. We found the accuracy of our system for the top 10 recommendations to be 87.0%, 22.9%, and 196.0% higher than that of MAS, ACM, and CiteSeer, respectively. In addition, we compared our system with Journal Finder and Journal Suggester, which are tools of Elsevier and Springer, respectively, that help authors find suitable journals in their series. The results revealed that the accuracy of our system was 329% higher than that of Journal Finder and 406% higher than that of Journal Suggester for the top 10 recommendations. Our web service is freely available at https://www.keaml.cn:8081/. Conclusions Our deep learning–based recommender system can suggest an appropriate journal list to help biomedical scientists and clinicians choose suitable venues for their papers.
机译:背景技术对于研究人员而言,在高质量期刊上发表研究成果非常重要。但是,考虑到期刊和会议的迅猛增长,选择最合适的出版场所通常是一项挑战。尽管推荐器系统在宣传电影,音乐和产品方面取得了成功,但是很少有研究探索出版场所的推荐,尤其是对于生物医学研究。没有可以专门推荐PubMed(生物医学文献最多的期刊)中的期刊的推荐系统。目标我们旨在提出一个名为Pubmender的出版推荐系统,以根据论文摘要来建议合适的PubMed期刊。方法在Pubmender中,首先使用预训练的word2vec来构建启动特征空间。随后,构建了深度卷积神经网络以实现摘要的高级表示,并采用完全连接的softmax模型来推荐最佳期刊。结果我们从PubMed Central的1130种期刊中收集了880,165篇论文,并从这些论文中提取了摘要作为经验数据集。我们比较了不同的推荐模型,例如Microsoft Academic Search(MAS)引擎上的Cavnar-Trenkle,这是一种针对计算机技术协会(ACM)和CiteSeer的数字图书馆的基于过滤的协作式推荐系统。我们发现,针对前10个建议的系统的准确性分别比MAS,ACM和CiteSeer的准确性高87.0%,22.9%和196.0%。此外,我们将系统与分别为Elsevier和Springer的工具Journal Journal Finder和Journal Recommendationer进行了比较,这可以帮助作者在各自的系列中找到合适的期刊。结果表明,对于前十项建议,我们系统的准确性比Journal Finder的准确性高329%,比Journal Recommendationer的准确性高406%。我们的Web服务可从https://www.keaml.cn:8081/免费获得。结论我们基于深度学习的推荐系统可为您推荐合适的期刊清单,以帮助生物医学科学家和临床医生为他们的论文选择合适的场所。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号