首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical Internet research >Following Up Nonrespondents to an Online Weight Management Intervention: Randomized Trial Comparing Mail versus Telephone
【24h】

Following Up Nonrespondents to an Online Weight Management Intervention: Randomized Trial Comparing Mail versus Telephone

机译:跟踪未答复者进行在线体重管理干预:邮件与电话比较的随机试验

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Attrition, or dropout, is a problem faced by many online health interventions, potentially threatening the inferential value of online randomized controlled trials.Objective: In the context of a randomized controlled trial of an online weight management intervention, where 85% of the baseline participants were lost to follow-up at the 12-month measurement, the objective was to examine the effect of nonresponse on key outcomes and explore ways to reduce attrition in follow-up surveys.Methods: A sample of 700 nonrespondents to the 12-month online follow-up survey was randomly assigned to a mail or telephone nonresponse follow-up survey. We examined response rates in the two groups, costs of follow-up, reasons for nonresponse, and mode effects. We ran several logistic regression models, predicting response or nonresponse to the 12-month online survey as well as predicting response or nonresponse to the follow-up survey.Results: We analyzed 210 follow-up respondents in the mail and 170 in the telephone group. Response rates of 59% and 55% were obtained for the telephone and mail nonresponse follow-up surveys, respectively. A total of 197 respondents (51.8%) gave reasons related to technical issues or email as a means of communication, with older people more likely to give technical reasons for noncompletion; 144 (37.9%) gave reasons related to the intervention or the survey itself. Mail follow-up was substantially cheaper: We estimate that the telephone survey cost about US $34 per sampled case, compared to US $15 for the mail survey. The telephone responses were subject to possible social desirability effects, with the telephone respondents reporting significantly greater weight loss than the mail respondents. The respondents to the nonresponse follow-up did not differ significantly from the 12-month online respondents on key outcome variables.Conclusions: Mail is an effective way to reduce attrition to online surveys, while telephone follow-up might lead to overestimating the weight loss for both the treatment and control groups. Nonresponse bias does not appear to be a significant factor in the conclusions drawn from the randomized controlled trial.
机译:背景:减员或辍学是许多在线健康干预所面临的问题,可能威胁在线随机对照试验的推论价值。目的:在在线体重管理干预的随机对照试验中,其中85%基线参与者在12个月的评估中失去了随访,目的是检查无应答对关键结局的影响,并探索减少随访调查中损耗的方法。方法:从700名无应答的12个样本中一个月的在线跟踪调查被随机分配到邮件或电话无响应的跟踪调查中。我们检查了两组的响应率,随访费用,无响应的原因和模式影响。我们运行了多个logistic回归模型,预测了对12个月在线调查的回应或不回应以及对后续调查的回应或不回应。结果:我们分析了邮件中的210名追踪者和电话组中的170名追踪者。 。电话和邮件无应答跟进调查的回应率分别为59%和55%。共有197名受访者(51.8%)提出了与技术问题或电子邮件相关的原因作为沟通手段,而老年人则更有可能提出不完工的技术原因; 144(37.9%)人提出与干预措施或调查本身相关的原因。邮件跟踪的费用要便宜得多:我们估计,电话调查的每个样本成本约为34美元,而邮件调查的成本为15美元。电话回复可能受到社会期望的影响,电话回复者的体重减轻明显大于邮件回复者。无反应随访的受访者与12个月在线受访者在关键结果变量上的差异不大。结论:邮件是减少在线调查损耗的有效方法,而电话随访可能导致体重减轻过高对于治疗组和对照组。从随机对照试验得出的结论中,无应答偏差似乎不是重要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号