...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical Internet research >Should Health Organizations Use Web 2.0 Media in Times of an Infectious Disease Crisis? An In-depth Qualitative Study of Citizens’ Information Behavior During an EHEC Outbreak
【24h】

Should Health Organizations Use Web 2.0 Media in Times of an Infectious Disease Crisis? An In-depth Qualitative Study of Citizens’ Information Behavior During an EHEC Outbreak

机译:卫生组织应在传染病危机时使用Web 2.0媒体吗?对EHEC爆发期间公民信息行为的深入定性研究

获取原文

摘要

Background: Web 2.0 media (eg, Facebook, Wikipedia) are considered very valuable for communicating with citizens in times of crisis. However, in the case of infectious disease outbreaks, their value has not been determined empirically. In order to be able to take full advantage of Web 2.0 media in such a situation, the link between these media, citizens’ information behavior, and citizens’ information needs has to be investigated.Objective: The goal of our study was to assess citizens’ Web 2.0 media use during an infectious disease outbreak and to determine which Web 2.0 medium is used for which goal. With this information, we wanted to formulate recommendations for health organizations that consider using Web 2.0 media as part of their communication strategy during an infectious disease outbreak.Methods: A total of 18 student participants kept an information diary for 4 weeks during the 2011 enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) outbreak in Germany. Of them, 9 lived at the epicenter of the outbreak and 9 of them at some distance. The diaries were supplemented by a qualitative pre-survey (demographics) and postsurvey (questioning their satisfaction with information provision during the outbreak).Results: The Internet appeared to be the most popular medium for passively receiving EHEC-related information, with news websites and websites of newspapers as the most consulted sources. Twitter was used for receiving information to a small degree, while Facebook played virtually no role. Participants indicated that they thought information posted on Twitter or Facebook was not reliable or was out of place. When actively seeking information, online newspapers and wikis were important sources. Several causes for (dis)satisfaction with information provision were uncovered: source credibility, contradicting messages, and a need for closure.Conclusions: During an infectious disease outbreak, our small sample of students did not see social media (like Facebook and Twitter) as suitable or reliable sources for communicating information, but primarily viewed them as a tool for communicating with friends. Wikis, however, did fill several information needs, especially when citizens are actively searching for information. For many, source credibility is an important asset of information usefulness. Finally, we provide several general recommendations for communicating with citizens during an infectious disease outbreak.
机译:背景:Web 2.0媒体(例如Facebook,Wikipedia)被认为在危机时期与公民交流非常有价值。但是,在传染病暴发的情况下,其价值尚未凭经验确定。为了能够在这种情况下充分利用Web 2.0媒体,必须研究这些媒体,公民的信息行为和公民的信息需求之间的联系。目的:我们的研究目标是评估公民Web 2.0介质在传染病爆发期间的使用,并确定哪种Web 2.0介质用于哪个目标。有了这些信息,我们想为在传染病爆发期间考虑使用Web 2.0媒体作为其沟通策略一部分的卫生组织制定建议。方法:在2011年肠出血性E期间,共有18名学生参加了为期4周的信息日记。德国爆发大肠杆菌(EHEC)。其中有9人生活在疫情的中心,其中9人居住在一定距离处。对日记进行定性的前调查(人口统计学)和后调查(质疑他们对疫情爆发期间提供信息的满意度)作为补充。结果:互联网似乎是最受欢迎的被动接收EHEC相关信息的媒体,新闻网站和报纸网站是最受欢迎的来源。 Twitter在某种程度上用于接收信息,而Facebook实际上没有作用。与会者指出,他们认为在Twitter或Facebook上发布的信息不可靠或不适当。在积极寻求信息时,在线报纸和Wiki是重要的信息来源。发现了对信息提供不满意的几个原因:来源可信度,信息矛盾和需要关闭。结论:在传染病爆发期间,我们的一小部分学生没有将社交媒体(如Facebook和Twitter)视为合适或可靠的信息交流来源,但主要将其视为与朋友交流的工具。但是,Wiki确实满足了一些信息需求,特别是在公民积极搜索信息时。对于许多人而言,来源信誉是信息有用性的重要资产。最后,我们提供了一些在传染病暴发期间与市民沟通的一般性建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号