...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical Internet research >Using Noninferiority Tests to Evaluate Telemedicine and E-Health Services: Systematic Review
【24h】

Using Noninferiority Tests to Evaluate Telemedicine and E-Health Services: Systematic Review

机译:使用非劣效性测试评估远程医疗和电子卫生服务:系统评价

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: An increasing number of studies within the field of telemedicine and e-health are designed as noninferiority studies, aiming to show that the telemedicine/e-health solution is not inferior to the traditional way of treating patients.Objective: The objective is to review and sum up the status of noninferiority studies within this field, describing advantages and pitfalls of this approach.Methods: PubMed was searched according to defined criteria, and 16 relevant articles were identified from the period 2008-June 2011.Results: Most of the studies were related to the fields of psychiatry and emergency medicine, and most were published in journals relating to these fields or in general scientific or general medicine journals. All the studies claimed to be noninferiority studies, but 7 out of 16 tested for statistical differences as a proxy of noninferiority.Conclusions: The methodological quality of the studies varied. We discuss optimal procedures for future noninferiority studies within the field of telemedicine and e-health and situations in which this approach is most appropriate.
机译:背景:远程医疗和电子医疗领域中越来越多的研究被设计为非劣效性研究,旨在表明远程医疗/电子医疗解决方案并不逊色于传统的患者治疗方法。方法:根据确定的标准搜索PubMed,从2008年6月至2011年6月期间鉴定出16篇相关文章。结果:大多数方法是非劣效性研究的现状,并描述了该方法的优势和陷阱。研究涉及精神病学和急诊医学领域,大多数发表在与这些领域有关的期刊上或在普通科学或普通医学期刊上。所有的研究都声称是非劣效性研究,但16项研究中有7项作为非劣效性的指标进行了统计差异测试。结论:研究的方法学质量各不相同。我们讨论了在远程医疗和电子卫生领域以及这种方法最适合的情况下进行未来非劣效性研究的最佳程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号