首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical Internet research >Consumer Decision-Making Based on Review Websites: Are There Differences Between Choosing a Hotel and Choosing a Physician?
【24h】

Consumer Decision-Making Based on Review Websites: Are There Differences Between Choosing a Hotel and Choosing a Physician?

机译:基于评论网站的消费者决策:选择酒店和选择医师之间有区别吗?

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Web users are increasingly encouraged to rate and review consumer services (eg, hotels, restaurants) and, more recently, this is also the case for physicians and medical services. The resemblance in the setup and design of commercial rating websites (CRWs) and Web-based physician rating websites (PRWs) raises the question of whether choice-making processes based on the two types of websites could also be similar.Objective: This qualitative study sought to explore the extent to which consumer decision making based on Web-based reviews is the same for consumer services (ie, choice of a hotel) and health services (ie, choice of a pediatrician), while providing an in-depth understanding of potential differences or similarities.Methods: Between June and August 2015, we carried out a total of 22 qualitative interviews with young parents residing in the German-speaking part of Switzerland. Participants were invited to complete 2 choice tasks, which involved (1) choosing a hotel based on the commercial Web-based rating website TripAdvisor and (2) selecting a pediatrician based on the PRW Jameda. To better understand consumers’ thought processes, we instructed participants to “think aloud”, namely to verbalize their thinking while sorting through information and reaching decisions. Using a semistructured interview guide, we subsequently posed open-ended questions to allow them to elaborate more on factors influencing their decision making, level of confidence in their final choice, and perceived differences and similarities in their search for a hotel and a physician. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using an inductive thematic approach.Results: Participants spent on average 9:57 minutes (standard deviation=9:22, minimum=3:46, maximum=22:25) searching for a hotel and 6:17 minutes (standard deviation=4:47, minimum=00:38, maximum=19:25) searching for a pediatrician. Although the choice of a pediatrician was perceived as more important than the choice of a hotel, participants found choosing a physician much easier than selecting an appropriate accommodation. Four main themes emerged from the analysis of our interview data that can explain the differences in search time and choice confidence: (1) trial and error, (2) trust, (3) competence assessment, and (4) affect and likeability.Conclusions: Our results suggest that, despite congruent website designs, individuals only trust review information to choose a hotel, but refuse to fully rely on it for selecting a physician. The design and content of Web-based PRWs need to be adjusted to better address the differing information needs of health consumers.
机译:背景:越来越多地鼓励Web用户对消费者服务(例如,旅馆,饭店)进行评分和评价,最近,医生和医疗服务也是如此。商业评级网站(CRW)和基于Web的医师评级网站(PRW)在设置和设计上的相似之处提出了一个问题,即基于这两种类型的网站的选择过程也可能相似。目的:这项定性研究力图探讨基于网络评论的消费者决策在多大程度上对消费者服务(即,选择旅馆)和健康服务(即,选择儿科医生),同时提供对以下方面的深入理解:方法:2015年6月至2015年8月,我们对居住在瑞士德语区的年轻父母进行了22次定性访谈。邀请参与者完成2个选择任务,其中包括(1)根据基于商业网络的评级网站TripAdvisor(TripAdvisor)选择一家酒店,以及(2)根据PRW Jameda选择一名儿科医生。为了更好地理解消费者的思维过程,我们指示参与者“大声思考”,即在整理信息并做出决策时说出他们的想法。随后,我们使用半结构化访谈指南提出了开放性问题,以使他们能够详细说明影响他们决策的因素,对最终选择的信心水平以及在寻找旅馆和医生方面的感知差异和相似之处。结果:参与者平均花费9:57分钟(标准差= 9:22,最小值= 3:46,最大值= 22:25)搜索酒店,并使用归纳主题方法进行了分析。 6:17分钟(标准差= 4:47,最小= 00:38,最大= 19:25)寻找儿科医生。尽管认为选择儿科医生比选择旅馆更重要,但参与者发现选择医师比选择合适的住宿要容易得多。我们对访谈数据的分析提出了四个主要主题,这些主题可以解释搜索时间和选择置信度的差异:(1)反复试验,(2)信任,(3)能力评估以及(4)影响力和可喜度。 :我们的结果表明,尽管网站设计一致,但个人仅信任评论信息来选择酒店,而拒绝完全依靠它来选择医生。需要对基于Web的PRW的设计和内容进行调整,以更好地满足健康消费者的不同信息需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号