...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical Internet research >Clinical Efficacy of Telemedicine Compared to Face-to-Face Clinic Visits for Smoking Cessation: Multicenter Open-Label Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial
【24h】

Clinical Efficacy of Telemedicine Compared to Face-to-Face Clinic Visits for Smoking Cessation: Multicenter Open-Label Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial

机译:远程戒烟与面对面就诊戒烟的临床疗效比较:多中心开放标签随机对照非劣效性试验

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Tobacco is a major public health concern. A 12-week standard smoking cessation program is available in Japan; however, it requires face-to-face clinic visits, which has been one of the key obstacles to completing the program, leading to a low smoking cessation success rate. Telemedicine using internet-based video counseling instead of regular clinic visits could address this obstacle. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of an internet-based remote smoking cessation support program compared with the standard face-to-face clinical visit program among patients with nicotine dependence. Methods This study was a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter, noninferiority trial. We recruited nicotine-dependent adults from March to June 2018. Participants randomized to the telemedicine arm received internet-based video counseling, whereas control participants received standard face-to-face clinic visits at each time point in the smoking cessation program. Both arms received a CureApp Smoking Cessation smartphone app with a mobile exhaled carbon monoxide checker. The primary outcome was a continuous abstinence rate (CAR) from weeks 9 to 12. Full analysis set was used for data analysis. Results We randomized 115 participants with nicotine dependence: 58 were allocated to the telemedicine (internet-based video counseling) arm and 57, to the control (standard face-to-face clinical visit) arm. We analyzed all 115 participants for the primary outcome. Both telemedicine and control groups had similar CARs from weeks 9 to 12 (81.0% vs 78.9%; absolute difference, 2.1%; 95% CI –12.8 to 17.0), and the lower limit of the difference between groups (–12.8%) was greater than the prespecified limit (–15%). Conclusions The application of telemedicine using internet-based video counseling as a smoking cessation program had a similar CAR from weeks 9 to 12 as that of the standard face-to-face clinical visit program. The efficacy of the telemedicine-based smoking cessation program was not inferior to that of the standard visit–based smoking cessation program. Trial Registration University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000031620; https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000035975.
机译:背景烟草是主要的公共卫生问题。日本有12周的标准戒烟计划。但是,这需要面对面的诊所就诊,这是完成该计划的主要障碍之一,导致戒烟成功率低。使用基于互联网的视频咨询而非常规的门诊就可以解决远程医疗问题。目的本研究旨在评估与尼古丁依赖患者的标准面对面临床访问计划相比,基于互联网的远程戒烟支持计划的有效性和可行性。方法该研究是一项随机,对照,开放标签,多中心,非劣效性试验。我们从2018年3月至2018年6月招募了依赖尼古丁的成年人。随机分组到远程医疗部门的参与者接受了基于互联网的视频咨询,而对照组参与者在戒烟计划中的每个时间点都接受了标准的面对面门诊。双方都收到了带有移动呼出气一氧化碳检查器的CureApp吸烟戒断智能手机应用程序。主要结果是从第9周到第12周的持续戒断率(CAR)。完整的分析集用于数据分析。结果我们随机分配了115名尼古丁依赖的参与者:58名被分配给远程医疗(基于互联网的视频咨询)部门,57名被分配给对照(标准的面对面临床就诊)部门。我们分析了所有115名参与者的主要结果。在第9周到第12周,远程医疗组和对照组的CAR相似(81.0%比78.9%;绝对差异为2.1%; 95%CI为12.8至17.0),两组之间的差异下限为–12.8%。大于预定限制(–15%)。结论使用基于互联网的视频咨询作为戒烟计划的远程医疗应用在9到12周内与标准的面对面临床就诊计划具有相似的CAR。基于远程医疗的戒烟计划的效果不逊于基于标准就诊的戒烟计划的效果。试验注册大学医院医学信息网络临床试验注册:UMIN000031620; https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000035975。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号