首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes therapy >Injectable Antihyperglycemics: A Systematic Review and Critical Analysis of the Literature on Adherence, Persistence, and Health Outcomes
【24h】

Injectable Antihyperglycemics: A Systematic Review and Critical Analysis of the Literature on Adherence, Persistence, and Health Outcomes

机译:注射用降血糖药:对坚持,坚持和健康成果文献的系统评价和批判性分析

获取原文
           

摘要

IntroductionImproving real-world medication adherence to injectable antihyperglycemics in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a clinical challenge. Quantification of the level of adherence required to achieve a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in glycemic control would assist in meeting this goal. The study objective was to review the literature regarding the relationships of medication adherence and persistence with health outcomes in adult T2DM patients using injectable antihyperglycemics. MethodsSystematic searches were conducted using electronic databases to identify publications over the last decade. Publications were screened against established eligibility criteria. Study data were extracted, evaluated, and used to identify strengths, limitations, and gaps in current evidence. ResultsEligibility criteria were met by 38 studies, and this report analyzed 34 studies related to glycemic control ( n =?25), healthcare resource use ( n =?9), and healthcare costs ( n =?14). Eight of these studies examined adherence to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA), including 1 study regarding adherence to GLP-1 RA or to insulin, and 1 study investigating a GLP-1 RA/insulin combination; the remaining studies involved insulin. Studies used a broad range of measures to classify adherence and persistence, and most measures were unable to reliably evaluate the complexities of patient behavior over time. Better adherence to injectable antihyperglycemic medications was generally found to be associated with improved glycemic control, although no studies attempted to identify a MCID. Although higher diabetes-related pharmacy and total healthcare costs were reported for adherent or persistent patients, these patients tended to have lower diabetes-related and all-cause medical costs. ConclusionResults of this review confirmed the effectiveness of injectable antihyperglycemic medications for glycemic control, suggesting that there are clinical and financial consequences to nonadherence. Although attempts were made to quantify the effects of nonadherence, the interpretation of study results was limited by the lack of a MCID and inadequate study design. FundingNovo Nordisk, Inc., Plainsboro Township, NJ, USA. Plain Language SummaryPlain language summary available for this article.
机译:简介在2型糖尿病(T2DM)中提高现实世界对可注射降血糖药的药物依从性是一项临床挑战。在血糖控制中达到临床上最小的重要差异(MCID)所需的依从性水平的量化将有助于实现此目标。本研究的目的是回顾有关使用注射降血糖药的成年T2DM患者中药物依从性和持久性与健康结果之间关系的文献。方法使用电子数据库进行系统搜索,以识别过去十年中的出版物。根据既定的资格标准筛选出版物。提取,评估研究数据,并用于确定当前证据的优势,局限性和差距。结果38项研究符合入选标准,该报告分析了34项与血糖控制(n = 25),医疗资源使用(n = 9)和医疗费用(n = 14)相关的研究。这些研究中有八项检查了对胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RA)的依从性,包括1项关于对GLP-1 RA或胰岛素依从性的研究,以及1项对GLP-1 RA /胰岛素组合的研究。其余研究涉及胰岛素。研究使用了广泛的措施来对依从性和持久性进行分类,并且大多数措施无法随着时间的推移可靠地评估患者行为的复杂性。尽管没有研究尝试确定MCID,但通常发现对可注射的降血糖药物有更好的依从性与改善血糖控制有关。尽管对于依从性或持续性患者,糖尿病相关的药房和总医疗费用据报道较高,但这些患者的糖尿病相关和全因医疗费用往往较低。结论这篇综述的结果证实了注射用抗高血糖药对血糖控制的有效性,这表明不依从存在临床和财务后果。尽管已尝试量化不坚持的影响,但由于缺少MCID和研究设计不足,对研究结果的解释受到限制。资金来源:美国新泽西州普莱恩斯伯勒镇的诺沃·诺德公司。普通语言摘要本文提供了普通语言摘要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号