...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical Internet research >Tweeting for and Against Public Health Policy: Response to the Chicago Department of Public Health's Electronic Cigarette Twitter Campaign
【24h】

Tweeting for and Against Public Health Policy: Response to the Chicago Department of Public Health's Electronic Cigarette Twitter Campaign

机译:赞成和反对公共卫生政策:回应芝加哥公共卫生部的电子烟Twitter运动

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: In January 2014, the Chicago City Council scheduled a vote on local regulation of electronic cigarettes as tobacco products. One week prior to the vote, the Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) released a series of messages about electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) through its Twitter account. Shortly after the messages, or tweets, were released, the department’s Twitter account became the target of a “Twitter bomb” by Twitter users sending more than 600 tweets in one week against the proposed regulation.Objective: The purpose of our study was to examine the messages and tweet patterns in the social media response to the CDPH e-cigarette campaign.Methods: We collected all tweets mentioning the CDPH in the week between the e-cigarette campaign and the vote on the new local e-cigarette policy. We conducted a content analysis of the tweets, used descriptive statistics to examine characteristics of involved Twitter users, and used network visualization and descriptive statistics to identify Twitter users prominent in the conversation.Results: Of the 683 tweets mentioning CDPH during the week, 609 (89.2%) were anti-policy. More than half of anti-policy tweets were about use of electronic cigarettes for cessation as a healthier alternative to combustible cigarettes (358/609, 58.8%). Just over one-third of anti-policy tweets asserted that the health department was lying or disseminating propaganda (224/609, 36.8%). Approximately 14% (96/683, 14.1%) of the tweets used an account or included elements consistent with “astroturfing”—a strategy employed to promote a false sense of consensus around an idea. Few Twitter users were from the Chicago area; Twitter users from Chicago were significantly more likely than expected to tweet in support of the policy.Conclusions: Our findings may assist public health organizations to anticipate, recognize, and respond to coordinated social media campaigns.
机译:背景:2014年1月,芝加哥市议会计划就电子烟作为烟草制品的地方法规进行投票。投票前一周,芝加哥公共卫生部(CDPH)通过其Twitter帐户发布了一系列有关电子烟(电子烟)的消息。消息或推文发布后不久,该部门的Twitter帐户成为Twitter用户的“ Twitter炸弹”的目标,Twitter用户在一周之内根据拟议的法规发送了600条以上的推文。目的:我们的研究目的是研究方法:我们收集了所有在电子烟活动与对新的本地电子烟政策进行投票之间的一周内提及CDPH的所有推文。我们对这些推文进行了内容分析,使用描述性统计数据检查了所涉及Twitter用户的特征,并使用网络可视化和描述性统计数据确定了在对话中突出的Twitter用户。结果:在本周内提及CDPH的683条推文中,有609条( 89.2%)是反政策的。超过一半的反政策推文是关于使用电子烟戒烟以替代可燃香烟的更健康选择(358 / 609,58.8%)。刚刚超过三分之一的反政策推文声称卫生部门在撒谎或散布宣传(224 / 609,36.8%)。大约14%(96/683,14.1%)的推文使用了帐户或包含了与“草皮”相符的元素,该策略用于促进围绕一个想法的错误共识。 Twitter用户很少来自芝加哥地区。来自芝加哥的Twitter用户发送推文以支持该政策的可能性大大超过了预期。结论:我们的发现可能有助于公共卫生组织预测,认识和响应协调的社交媒体活动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号