...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Thoracic Disease >Randomized controlled trials of induction treatment and surgery versus combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy in stages IIIA-N2 NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Randomized controlled trials of induction treatment and surgery versus combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy in stages IIIA-N2 NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:IIIA-N2期非小细胞肺癌的诱导治疗和手术与联合化疗和放疗的随机对照试验:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文

摘要

Background: The efficacy of induction treatment plus surgery for improving postoperative survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in stages IIIA-N2 is controversial, especially compared with the combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy. We therefore performed a systematic review and metaanalysis of the published phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to quantitatively evaluate the survival benefit of preoperative induction treatment vs. combined chemoradiotherapy. Methods: We systematically searched for trials that started after January, 1980. We excluded relevant studies using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) standards. Our primary endpoint, overall survival (OS), was defined as the time from randomisation until death (any cause). Secondary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library were used for the study search. All analyses were by intention to treat. Results: Three studies (1,084 patients) were centrally selected and analyzed for the present meta-analysis. Combination of the three randomized controlled trials showed that there was no significant benefit of induction treatment plus surgery compared to combined chemoradiotherapy on 2-year OS [risk ratio (RR) =1.00; 95% CI, 0.85-1.17; P=0.98] and 4-year OS (RR =1.13; 95% CI, 0.85-1.51; P=0.39). However, from the subgroup analysis, it showed a significant PFS benefit (RR =1.78; 95% CI, 1.08-2.92; P=0.02) regarded chemoradiotherapy as preoperative induction treatment, compared with chemotherapy alone for induction treatment (PFS) (RR =1.05; 95% CI, 0.61-1.81; P=0.86). Conclusions: There was no significant OS benefit of induction treatment plus surgery compared with combined chemoradiotherapy in patients with NSCLC (stages IIIA-pN2) at 2 and 4 years. However, we could conclude PFS could be improved when radiation therapy was added into preoperative induction treatment. Given the potential advantages of adding radiation preoperatively, clinicians should consider using this treatment strategy in the stage IIIA-N2 disease after fully assessment of the patients.
机译:背景:对于IIIA-N2期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,诱导治疗加手术改善术后生存的疗效尚有争议,特别是与化学疗法和放射疗法相结合时。因此,我们对已发表的III期随机临床试验(RCT)进行了系统的回顾和荟萃分析,以定量评估术前诱导治疗与联合放化疗的生存获益。方法:我们系统地搜索了1980年1月以后开始的试验。我们使用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)标准排除了相关研究。我们的主要终点是总生存期(OS),定义为从随机分组到死亡(任何原因)的时间。次要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。使用PubMed,EMBASE和Cochrane库进行研究搜索。所有分析均按意向治疗。结果:集中选择了三项研究(1,084例患者),并对其进行了荟萃分析。这三项随机对照试验的组合显示,与联合放化疗相比,两年期OS的诱导治疗加手术治疗没有显着优势[风险比(RR)= 1.00; 95%CI,0.85-1.17; P = 0.98]和4年OS(RR = 1.13; 95%CI,0.85-1.51; P = 0.39)。然而,从亚组分析来看,与单纯的诱导治疗(PFS)相比,放化疗是术前诱导治疗,PFS获益显着(RR = 1.78; 95%CI,1.08-2.92; P = 0.02)。 1.05; 95%CI,0.61-1.81; P = 0.86)。结论:与放化疗相比,在2年和4年时,NSCLC患者(IIIA-pN2期)与联合放化疗相比没有明显的OS获益。然而,我们可以得出结论,在术前诱导治疗中加入放射治疗可以改善PFS。鉴于术前增加放射线的潜在优势,临床医生应在对患者进行充分评估后考虑在IIIA-N2期疾病中使用这种治疗策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号