首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Young Pharmacists >Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Deferiprone and Deferasirox on Thalassemia Major Patients in Tangerang District Hospital, Indonesia
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Deferiprone and Deferasirox on Thalassemia Major Patients in Tangerang District Hospital, Indonesia

机译:印尼坦格朗区医院地拉普龙和地拉罗司克治疗地中海贫血重症患者的成本-效果分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Blood transfusion are needed in improving the quality of life of thalassemia major patients. However since it can lead to excess iron, the iron chelation therapy is needed. Deferiprone and deferasirox are the most often used therapy in Indonesia. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of deferasirox with deferiprone with costeffectiveness analysis (CEA). Methods: Data were taken retrospectively and sampling was done using total sampling based on medical records and hospital information system. Serum ferritin levels of patients consuming deferasirox (n=27) and deferiprone (n=33) were measured to observe the mean changes of serum ferritin levels as effectiveness’ parameter. The cost was median of the total direct medical cost, summed from the cost of drugs, medical devices, hospitalization, administration, physician, laboratories and blood bags. Results: Based on the results of this study, the effectiveness of deferasirox (1164 ng/mL) was greater than deferiprone (692 ng/mL). Median total cost of deferasirox was more expensive (Rp 76,610,618.69) than deferiprone (Rp 51,869,965.64). Cost-effectiveness ratio of deferasirox (CER: Rp 65,816.68/effectiveness) was lower than deferiprone (CER: Rp 74,956.60/ effectiveness). None of both medications was dominant and therefore we could not determine which medication was the most cost-effective therapy. Changing of medication from deferiprone to deferasirox requires an extra cost of Rp 52,416.64 per one incremental unit of effectivity. Conclusion : The policy maker in healthcare facility need to consider the budget and whether the incremental cost of deferasirox is proportional to its increased effectiveness.
机译:背景:需要进行输血以改善重型地中海贫血患者的生活质量。但是,由于它会导致铁过多,因此需要进行铁螯合疗法。在印度尼西亚,去铁酮和地拉罗司是最常用的疗法。目的:本研究的目的是通过成本效益分析(CEA)比较地拉罗司和去铁酮的成本效益。方法:回顾性收集数据,并根据病历和医院信息系统使用总抽样进行抽样。测量服用地拉罗司(n = 27)和去铁酮(n = 33)的患者的血清铁蛋白水平,以观察血清铁蛋白水平的平均变化作为有效性参数。费用是直接医疗总费用的中位数,由药品,医疗设备,住院,行政,医生,实验室和血袋的费用相加得出。结果:根据这项研究的结果,地拉罗司(1164 ng / mL)的效力大于去铁酮(692 ng / mL)。 Deferasirox的总成本中位数比Deferiprone(Rp 51,869,965.64)更昂贵(Rp 76,610,618.69)。地拉罗司的成本效益比(CER:Rp 65,816.68 /有效性)低于去铁酮(CER:Rp 74,956.60 /有效性)。两种药物都不是主要药物,因此我们无法确定哪种药物是最具成本效益的疗法。将药物从去铁酮更改为地拉罗司需要每增加一个有效单位的Rp 52,416.64。结论:医疗机构的决策者需要考虑预算以及地拉罗司的增量成本是否与其有效性增加成正比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号