首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Traditional Chinese Medical Sciences >Clinical application of traditional herbal medicine in five countries and regions: Japan; South Korea; Mainland China; Hong Kong, China; Taiwan, China
【24h】

Clinical application of traditional herbal medicine in five countries and regions: Japan; South Korea; Mainland China; Hong Kong, China; Taiwan, China

机译:日本在五个国家和地区的传统草药的临床应用:韩国;中国大陆;中国香港;中国台湾

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To study the characteristics of the clinical application of traditional herbal medicine in five countries and regions where traditional medicine (TM) is widely used: Japan; South Korea; mainland China; Hong Kong, China; Taiwan, China. And to analyze, from multiple angles, the variations in the methods of TM used in each countries and regions. Methods Fifty commonly used traditional herbs (TOP50) from classical formulae were selected, and descriptive statistics, correlation analyses, and Friedman test were used to compare methods of clinical application and dosages in the countries and regions of interest based on a retrospective review of randomly-selected medical records. Results There were significant differences in sequencing TOP50 among the five countries and regions ( P ??.01). The adherence to the classical formulae, from strong to weak was Japan; mainland China; Taiwan, China; Hong Kong, China; South Korea. There were also significant differences in TOP50 dosing regimens ( P ??.01). Overall dosages of TOP50 from high to low were: mainland China; Hong Kong, China; Taiwan, China; South Korea; Japan. Finally, there were significant differences in the dosage intervals ( P ??.01), with dosage intervals from maximum to minimum as follows: mainland China; Taiwan, China; Hong Kong, China; South Korea; Japan. Conclusions The clinical dosages of traditional herbal medicine used in the mainland China are relatively large compared with those prescribed in the other four countries and regions, and the range of dosages in mainland China is more flexible. On the other hand, clinical dosages of TOP50 are the lowest in Japan, where the dosage range is also the narrowest, supporting the idea that Doctors of Kampo medicine are highly cautious and are likely to adhere strictly to classical formulae, while Hong Kong, China and Taiwan, China are in the middle. The dosage of TOP50 in South Korea is significantly lower than that used in the mainland China; Hong Kong, China and Taiwan, China where the adherence to the classical formulae was the lowest, albeit slightly higher than that in Japan. The methods of clinical application of traditional herbal medicine in the five countries and regions were affected by multiple factors, including history, geography, climate, and culture.
机译:目的研究在五个广泛使用传统医学(TM)的国家和地区中传统医学的临床应用特点:韩国;中国大陆;中国香港;中国台湾。并从多个角度分析每个国家和地区使用TM的方法的变化。方法从经典配方中选出50种常用传统草药(TOP50),并根据回顾性回顾性回顾性研究,使用描述性统计数据,相关分析和弗里德曼检验比较感兴趣的国家和地区的临床应用方法和剂量。选定的病历。结果在五个国家和地区中,TOP50的测序存在显着差异(P <0.01)。日本从强到弱都遵循经典公式。中国大陆;中国台湾;中国香港;韩国。 TOP50给药方案也存在显着差异(P 0.01)。 TOP50从高到低的总剂量为:中国大陆;中国香港;中国台湾;韩国;日本。最后,剂量间隔存在显着差异(P <0.01),最大和最小剂量间隔如下:中国大陆;中国台湾;中国香港;韩国;日本。结论与其他四个国家和地区相比,中国大陆地区传统中草药的临床用药剂量较大,中国大陆地区的用药范围更加灵活。另一方面,TOP50的临床剂量在日本是最低的,其剂量范围也是最窄的,这支持了Kampo药物医生非常谨慎并且可能严格遵守经典配方的观点,而中国香港和中国台湾在中间。韩国的TOP50剂量明显低于中国大陆。中国香港和中国台湾地区对经典公式的遵守程度最低,尽管比日本略高。在五个国家和地区,传统草药的临床应用方法受到多种因素的影响,包括历史,地理,气候和文化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号