...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Scientific Research and Reports >Stroke Risk Classification by Use of the CHADS2Score in Community Population in Absence of AtrialFibrillation
【24h】

Stroke Risk Classification by Use of the CHADS2Score in Community Population in Absence of AtrialFibrillation

机译:在没有心房颤动的社区人群中使用CHADS2Score进行中风风险分类

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives: To use CHADS2 and Community Stroke Risk Classification (CSRC) scores to describe and classify the distribution of the risk factors of stroke in a population without known atrial fibrillation (AF).Study Design: Was community, cross-sectional study.Place and Duration of Study: North Africa, among individuals living in capital of Libya (Tripoli); study is done by the community & family medical department, faculty of medicine, University of Tripoli, from 1/1/2010 to 31/12/2014Methodology: A total of 7497 individuals did not have AF (52.8%male & 48.2% female) who were interviewed by doctors using CHADS2 and CSRC scores.Results: According to both CHADS2 scores and CSRC, about 64.2 %of the study population had at least one risk factor of stroke while 35.8% had no risk factors. Among people having CHADS2 risk score, the majority (41.3%) had an intermediate risk score (P<0.01), which corresponds to an intermediate or moderate stroke risk, and 22.9% have a high risk score which corresponds to a higher stroke risk. According to the CSRC score, the majority of people (44.6%) had intermediate score grades (P<0.001), and 19.6% had a high risk score with three risk factors or more. An intermediate score (1-2 Risk Factors) dominated in all study age groups in comparison to high scores (3-6 Risk Factors) (P<0.001); Hypertension and Diabetes are the major risk factors of stroke in all scores, especially those of intermediate (P<0.001). Finally, in comparison to females, males show a significant increase in all score grades especially in intermediate CHADS2 & CSRC score risk (P<0.004) and this could be related to a genetic-behavior difference.Conclusion: Both the CHADS2 score and CSRC are simple tools that can be used for stroke risk description and assessment among communities of people who do not have atrial fibrillation. In addition, most communities of people have at least one risk factor for stroke, and this corresponds to intermediate scores; the highest risk factors contributing to the intermediate scores are hypertension, diabetes mellitus and being of an age of over forty years. Other risk factors of stroke like congestive heart failure, transient ischemic attack and history of prior stroke usually present among people who have high scores; this means it comes with or as result of other risk factors to form multiple risk factors associated with stroke forming higher scores of CHADS2 and CSRC
机译:目的:使用CHADS2和社区卒中风险分类(CSRC)评分来描述和分类没有已知房颤(AF)的人群中风的危险因素分布。研究设计:进行社区横断面研究。学习时间:北非,居住在利比亚首都的黎波里(的黎波里);该研究由的黎波里大学医学院社区与家庭医学系于2010年1月1日至2014年12月31日进行。方法:共有7497个人没有房颤(男性52.8%,男性48.2%)结果:根据CHADS2分数和CSRC评分,约64.2%的研究人群中至少有一种中风危险因素,而35.8%的人没有中风危险因素。在具有CHADS2风险评分的人群中,大多数(41.3 %)的患者具有中等风险评分(P <0.01),对应于中度或中度卒中风险,而22.9%的患者具有较高的风险评分,对应于较高的中风风险。根据中国证监会的评分,大多数人(44.6%)的得分为中级(P <0.001),有13.6%的人的高风险得分为三个或以上危险因素。与高分(3-6个危险因素)相比,所有研究年龄组的中等分数(1-2个危险因素)占主导地位(P <0.001);在所有评分中,高血压和糖尿病是中风的主要危险因素,尤其是中级(P <0.001)。最后,与女性相比,男性在所有分数等级上都有显着提高,尤其是在中级CHADS2和CSRC分数风险中(P <0.004),这可能与遗传行为差异有关。结论:CHADS2分数和CSRC均为简单的工具,可用于在没有房颤的人群中进行中风风险描述和评估。另外,大多数人至少有一个中风的危险因素,这相当于中级分数。导致中级评分最高的危险因素是高血压,糖尿病和年龄超过40岁。其他中风的危险因素,如充血性心力衰竭,短暂性脑缺血发作和以前的中风病史通常存在于高分人群中。这意味着它伴随着其他危险因素或由于其他危险因素而形成与中风相关的多种危险因素,形成了较高的CHADS2和CSRC分数

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号