...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Threatened Taxa >A comparative study of the diet of the Indian Eagle Owl Bubo bengalensis (Franklin, 1831) from two distinct habitats in the Tamil Nadu - Puducherry area, southern India
【24h】

A comparative study of the diet of the Indian Eagle Owl Bubo bengalensis (Franklin, 1831) from two distinct habitats in the Tamil Nadu - Puducherry area, southern India

机译:来自印度南部泰米尔纳德邦-Puducherry地区两个不同栖息地的印度鹰Bu Bung bengalensis(Franklin,1831)饮食的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

A total of 166 prey items were identified from pellets, pellet remains and prey remains – 84 from Arunachala Hill and 82 from Pondicherry University campus. The total biomass encountered from pellet and prey remains was 22,620.17g – 11,240.59g from Arunachala and 11,379.58g from Pondicherry University. Out of the 166 prey items 102 were non-volant small mammals accounting for a biomass of 13,973.90g – 5,616.83g (49.94%) from Arunachala and 8,357.07g (73.42%) from Pondicherry University. Even among these murid rodents dominated – 44.99% in Arunachala and 70.13% in Pondy University. Milvus migrans were predated upon by Bubo bengalensis and 10 partly eaten carcasses were recovered – hence they could not be assigned a category as the quantity consumed could not be determined. It is a well known fact that Eagle Owls are intolerant to other avian predators, and territorial behaviour and intraguild aggression / predation could be responsible for this phenomenon. 3 other partly consumed remains of birds were also encountered and these too could not be assigned a category for the same reason that the quantity ingested could not be determined. Anurans occurred for a combined biomass of 12.87% in both areas. The rest, viz. Coleoptera, Orthoptera and Paratelphusa sp. accounted for a paltry biomass of 0.51%. The difference between murid rodents occurring in the two habitats was illuminating. In Arunachala the constant food of the owls were the field rodents Millardia meltada (15.47%), Bandicota bengalensis (8.74%) and Tatera indica (11.65%), and a single Bandicota indica (6.07%) which is a species found around rural habitations. The first two species were conspicuous by their absence in Pondicherry University and the Tatera indica was encountered in very small quantities (3.70%). Uniquely enough, the terrestrial and fossorial forms of urban rodents formed the basic food of Bubo bengalensis in Pondicherry University – Rattus rattus (20.64%) and Bandicota indica (43.94%). Both these species are human commensals and occur in pestilential proportions in urban habitats. The specific identity of Mus spp. could not be derived due to the complexity of identification, but as our specimens are housed in the repository of WILD molecular analysis could shed light on the species complex in the near future. We have compared non-volant small mammal prey of the regions we studied with those of Maharastra and the results are discussed.
机译:从小球,小球残骸和猎物残骸中共鉴定出166个猎物,其中Arunachala Hill有84个,Pondicherry大学校园有82个。从颗粒和猎物残骸中遇到的总生物量为22,620.17g –来自Arunachala的11,240.59g和来自Pondicherry大学的11,379.58g。在166个猎物中,有102个是非挥发性小哺乳动物,它们的生物量分别为13,973.90g – Arunachala的5,616.83g(49.94%)和Pondicherry大学的8,357.07g(73.42%)。即使在这些啮齿动物中也占主导地位–阿鲁纳卡拉(Arunachala)为44.99%,庞迪大学为70.13%。孟加拉Bu(Milbos migrans)被孟加拉虎(Bubo)捕食,并回收了10个部分食用的car体–因此由于无法确定消耗的数量,因此无法将其归为一类。众所周知,鹰Eagle对其他鸟类的捕食者不宽容,领土行为和行会内部的侵略/掠夺可能是造成这种现象的原因。还遇到了另外3个部分消耗的鸟类遗骸,由于无法确定摄入量的原因,也无法将其归为一类。在这两个区域中,发生无绿藻的生物量合计为12.87%。其余的,即。鞘翅目,直翅目和Paratelphusa sp。占微不足道的0.51%。在这两个栖息地中发生的鼠类啮齿动物之间的差异具有启发性。在Arunachala中,猫头鹰的食物是田鼠(Millardia Melada)(15.47%),Bandicota bengalensis(8.74%)和Tatera indica(11.65%),以及在农村栖息地附近发现的单一Bandicota indica(6.07%)。 。前两个物种因在朋迪榭里大学的缺席而引人注目,而印度泰特拉的数量很少(3.70%)。十分独特的是,城市啮齿动物的陆地和地面形态构成了邦迪切里大学孟加拉大腹便便的基本食物,即鼠兔(20.64%)和班蒂卡达64地(43.94%)。这两个物种都是人类共鸣,并以瘟疫的比例出现在城市栖息地中。 Mus spp的具体身份。由于鉴定的复杂性而无法得出,但是由于我们的标本被存放在WILD分子库中,因此分子分析可能会在不久的将来阐明物种的复杂性。我们将所研究区域的非挥发性小型哺乳动物猎物与马哈拉斯特拉地区的非挥发性小型哺乳动物猎物进行了比较,并对结果进行了讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号