首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Threatened Taxa >Comparative cross-sectional survey on gastrointestinal parasites of captive, semi-captive, and wild Elephants of Sri Lanka
【24h】

Comparative cross-sectional survey on gastrointestinal parasites of captive, semi-captive, and wild Elephants of Sri Lanka

机译:斯里兰卡圈养,半圈养和野生象胃肠道寄生虫的比较横断面调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Parasites can influence the fitness of individuals particularly of small populations of endangered species. An island-wide, cross sectional, coprological survey was carried out from 03 January to 30 October 2015, to determine the gastrointestinal (GI) parasites of the Sri Lankan Elephant Elephas maximus maximus . Fresh fecal samples from wild, captive and semi-captive elephants were collected and analyzed using a modified salt floatation, Sheather’s sucrose floatation, direct iodine smears, and sedimentation methods. Species identification was done morphologically. Intensity of parasite infections was determined using McMaster technique. A total of 85 fecal samples (wild = 45, semi-captive = 20, captive = 20) were analysed; 58 (68.2%) samples were positive for GI parasites. Overall, helminth infections (60.0%) were more common than protozoan (37.6%) infections (Chi square test, χ 2 = 8.499; p < 0.001). In the captive elephants, however, more protozoan infections were observed than helminthes, which could be due to anthelminthic treatment. A significantly higher prevalence of infection was observed in the wild elephants (93.3%) compared to semi-captive elephants (55.0%; χ 2 = 13.516; p < 0.001) and captive elephants (25.0%; χ 2 =32.289; p < 0.001) but there was no significant difference in the prevalence between captive and semi-captive elephants (χ 2 =3.750; p = 0.053). Ten types of GI parasites were observed, nine of which were recorded in wild elephants. Among them the most common infection was strongyles (34.1%) with high intensity (440.1±295.2 EPG). Semi-captive elephants harbored five types of GI parasites, while captive elephants had only three types. One captive elephant at the Temple of the Tooth was infected with the tapeworm Anoplocephala sp. at low intensity of 50 EPG. Some of the GI parasites recorded are highly pathogenic while others are incidental.
机译:寄生虫会影响个体的适应能力,尤其是少数濒危物种的适应能力。 2015年1月3日至10月30日进行了全岛范围的细菌学调查,以确定斯里兰卡象最大象(Elephas maximus maximus)的胃肠道(GI)寄生虫。采集野生,圈养和半圈养大象的新鲜粪便样品,并使用改良的盐浮法,希瑟的蔗糖浮法,直接碘涂片法和沉淀法进行分析。物种鉴定在形态上进行。使用McMaster技术确定寄生虫感染的强度。总共分析了85个粪便样本(野生= 45,半圈养= 20,圈养= 20); 58(68.2%)个样本的胃肠道寄生虫呈阳性。总体而言,蠕虫感染(60.0%)比原生动物(37.6%)感染更为普遍(卡方检验,χ2 = 8.499; p <0.001)。但是,在圈养的大象中,发现的原生动物感染多于蠕虫,这可能是由于驱虫治疗所致。与半圈养大象(55.0%;χ2 = 13.516; p <0.001)和圈养大象(25.0%;χ2 = 32.289; p <0.001)相比,野生大象(93.3%)的感染率明显更高),但圈养和半圈养大象的患病率没有显着差异(χ2 = 3.750; p = 0.053)。观察到十种类型的胃肠道寄生虫,其中九种记录在野象中。其中最常见的感染是高强度(440.1±295.2 EPG)的铜霉菌(34.1%)。半圈养大象藏有五种胃肠道寄生虫,而圈养大象只有三种。牙齿寺的一头俘虏大象被was虫Anoplocephala sp。感染。低强度的50 EPG。记录的一些胃肠道寄生虫具有高致病性,而其他寄生虫则是偶然的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号