...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine: Official Journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine >Repeatability and Reproducibility of Fetal Cardiac Ventricular Volume Calculations Using Spatiotemporal Image Correlation and Virtual Organ Computer-Aided Analysis
【24h】

Repeatability and Reproducibility of Fetal Cardiac Ventricular Volume Calculations Using Spatiotemporal Image Correlation and Virtual Organ Computer-Aided Analysis

机译:时空图像相关性和虚拟器官计算机辅助分析计算胎儿心室容积的可重复性和可重复性

获取原文

摘要

Objective. The objective of this study was to quantify the repeatability and reproducibility of fetal cardiac ventricular volumes obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) and Virtual Organ Computer-Aided Analysis (VOCAL; GE Healthcare, Kretztechnik, Zipf, Austria). Methods. A technique was developed to compute ventricular volumes using the subfeature Contour Finder: Trace. Twenty-five normal pregnancies were evaluated for the following: (1) to compare the coefficient of variation (CV) of ventricular volumes obtained using 15° and 30° rotation; (2) to compare the CV between 3 methods of quantifying ventricular volumes: (a) Manual Trace, (b) Inversion Mode, and (c) Contour Finder: Trace; and (3) to determine repeatability by calculating agreement and reliability of ventricular volumes when each STIC was measured twice by 3 observers. Reproducibility was assessed by obtaining 2 STICs from each of 44 normal pregnancies. For each STIC, 2 ventricular volume calculations were performed, and agreement and reliability were evaluated. Additionally, measurement error was examined. Results. (1) Agreement was better with 15° rotation than 30° (15°: 3.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0%–4.2%; versus 30°: 7.1%; 95% CI, 5.8%–8.6%; P < .001); (2) ventricular volumes obtained with Contour Finder: Trace had better agreement than those obtained using either Inversion Mode (Contour Finder: Trace: 3.6%; 95% CI, 3.0%–4.2%; versus Inversion Mode: 6.0%; 95% CI, 4.9%–7.2%; P < .001) or Manual Trace (10.5%; 95% CI, 8.7%–12.5%; P < .001); (3) ventricular volumes were repeatable with good agreement and excellent reliability for both intraobserver and interobserver measurements; and (4) ventricular volumes were reproducible with negligible differences in agreement and good reliability. In addition, bias between STIC acquisitions was minimal (<1%; mean percent difference, ?0.4%; 95% limits of agreement, ?5.4%–5.9%). Conclusions. Fetal echocardiography using STIC and VOCAL allows repeatable and reproducible calculation of ventricular volumes with the subfeature Contour Finder: Trace.
机译:目的。这项研究的目的是量化使用时空图像相关性(STIC)和虚拟器官计算机辅助分析(VOCAL; GE Healthcare,Kretztechnik,Zipf,Austria)获得的胎儿心脏心室容积的可重复性和可再现性。方法。开发了一种使用子功能Contour Finder:Trace计算心室容积的技术。对25例正常妊娠进行了以下评估:(1)比较使用15°和30°旋转获得的心室容积的变异系数(CV); (2)比较定量心室容积的3种方法之间的CV:(a)手动跟踪,(b)反转模式和(c)Contour Finder:跟踪; (3)当3位观察者对每个STIC进行两次测量时,通过计算心室容积的一致性和可靠性来确定可重复性。通过从44例正常妊娠中各获得2例STIC来评估可重复性。对于每个STIC,进行2次心室容积计算,并评估一致性和可靠性。另外,检查了测量误差。结果。 (1)15度旋转比30度更好(15°:3.6%; 95%置信区间[CI],3.0%–4.2%; 30°:7.1%; 95%CI,5.8%–8.6% ; P <.001); (2)使用Contour Finder获得的心室体积比使用两种反转模式获得的心室容积具有更好的一致性(Contour Finder:Trace:3.6%; 95%CI,3.0%–4.2%;与Inversion模式:6.0%; 95%CI ,4.9%–7.2%; P <.001)或手动跟踪(10.5%; 95%CI,8.7%–12.5%; P <.001); (3)观察者内和观察者间测量的心室容积可重复,一致性好,可靠性高。 (4)心室容积可重现,一致性和良好的可靠性可忽略不计。此外,STIC收购之间的偏差很小(<1%;平均百分比差异,?0.4%;协议限制的95%,? 5.4%-5.9%)。结论。使用STIC和VOCAL进行的胎儿超声心动图检查可通过子功能Contour Finder:Trace进行可重复和可重复的心室容积计算。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号