首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vector ecology: journal of the Society for Vector Ecology >Bromeliad targeted foliar treatments with Aqualuer® 20‐20 for hot spot mitigation using three hand sprayers against Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae)
【24h】

Bromeliad targeted foliar treatments with Aqualuer® 20‐20 for hot spot mitigation using three hand sprayers against Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae)

机译:使用三支手动喷雾器针对白纹伊蚊(Diptera:lic科)用Aqualuer®20-20进行凤梨科针对性的叶面处理,以减轻热点

获取原文
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION Aedes albopictus (Skuse) is a potential urban vector of dengue, chikungunya, and Zika viruses (Derraik and Slaney 2015, Wilson and Chen 2015). Container‐inhabiting mosquitoes such as Ae. albopictus have opportunistic feeding patterns that are not restricted to crepuscular or evening times and invade containers in close association with humans (Skiff and Yee 2014, Chandel et al. 2016). Source reduction programs are effective in targeting these container‐inhabiting mosquitoes when carried out comprehensively (CDC 2016, Unlu et al. 2014), but such programs can become operationally costly and difficult to sustain, particularly when oviposition sites are cryptic and difficult to accurately survey (Unlu et al. 2013, Faraji and Unlu 2016). Combining source reduction with direct control methods, such as larviciding with residual control and adulticide treatments, can help mitigate costs by reducing labor requirements (Abramides et al. 2011, Fonseca et al. 2013). Aedes albopictus and other mosquitoes require harborage to protect them from harsh daytime conditions, which has been exploited with vegetative and foliage treatments using residual applications (Li et al. 2010, Unlu et al. 2017). Targeting foliage as a primary means of adult mosquito control has since been reinforced in densely vegetated suburban and rural landscapes in Queensland, Australia (Muzari et al. 2014) and echoed in Ae. albopictus eradication programs in the southern Australian islands where foliage treatments were prioritized for preventing the spread of Ae. albopictus (Muzari et al. 2017). Previous to this study, however, there has not been an attempt to see if treating bromeliads as a key harborage would result in reduction of mosquitoes in peridomestic environments. Bromeliads are key vegetative harborages and larval rearing sites, even when competing with peridomestic sources such as tires, pots, and plastic containers (Nordin et al. 2017). Aedes albopictus have also been found to consistently proliferate in bromeliad larval sites throughout the year in warm environments (Xue et al. 2018) and typically outcompete Ae. aegypti (L.) and native species in urbanized environments (Ceretti et al. 2016, Docile et al. 2017). Point‐source bromeliad treatment could provide similar benefits as foliar treatments while reducing the coverage needed to exert control on the peridomestic mosquito population. Also, the evaluation of application tools is a critical demand among mosquito control professionals (Conover et al. 2015) and is an ongoing objective for future work. To investigate both needs, three new hand‐held pump sprayer models were screened before being used to treat bromeliads to explore hand‐application tools for point‐source strategies and test the viability of bromeliad‐focused management for reducing Ae. albopictus in St. Augustine, FL.
机译:引言白纹伊蚊(Skuse)是登革热,基孔肯雅热和寨卡病毒的潜在城市传播媒介(Derraik and Slaney 2015,Wilson and Chen 2015)。居住在容器中的蚊子,例如Ae。白化病的机会性喂养方式不仅限于晚上或晚上,而且与人类密切相关地侵入容器(Skiff and Yee 2014,Chandel等人2016)。当全面实施时,减少源头计划可以有效地针对这些居住在容器中的蚊子(CDC 2016,Unlu等人,2014),但是这样的计划可能会在运营上变得成本高昂且难以维持,特别是当产卵地点隐秘且难以准确调查时(Unlu et al.2013,Faraji and Unlu 2016)。将减少源与直接控制方法相结合,例如通过残留控制和杀幼虫剂处理幼虫,可以通过减少劳动力需求来帮助降低成本(Abramides等,2011; Fonseca等,2013)。白纹伊蚊和其他蚊子需要避难所,以保护它们免受恶劣的白天条件的侵害,这已通过使用残留物进行植物和树叶处理而得到利用(Li等人,2010; Unlu等人,2017)。此后,在澳大利亚昆士兰州茂密的郊区和乡村景观中,以树叶为主要控制蚊虫的主要手段得到了加强(Muzari等人,2014年),在大江上也得到了回应。澳大利亚南部岛屿上的白化病根除计划优先考虑进行叶面处理,以防止Ae传播。白化病(Muzari et al.2017)。但是,在此研究之前,还没有尝试过将凤梨科植物作为主要避难所,是否会减少围产期环境中的蚊子。凤梨科动物是重要的植物栖息地和幼体饲养场所,即使与轮胎,花盆和塑料容器之类的蠕动源竞争时也是如此(Nordin et al.2017)。还发现白纹伊蚊全年在温暖的环境中在凤梨科幼虫中持续繁殖(Xue et al.2018),通常胜过Ae。埃及人(L.)和城市化环境中的本地物种(Ceretti等人2016,Docile等人2017)。点源凤梨科治疗可能会提供与叶面治疗相似的好处,同时减少了控制家兔周围蚊子种群所需的覆盖范围。同样,对应用工具的评估也是蚊子控制专业人士的关键需求(Conover等,2015),并且是未来工作的一个持续目标。为了研究这两种需求,在用于治疗凤梨病之前筛选了三种新型手持泵式喷雾器模型,以探索用于点源策略的手动应用工具,并测试以凤梨病为重点的管理方法以降低Ae。佛罗里达州圣奥古斯丁的白化病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号