...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences >Comparing methane emissions from different sheep-keeping systems in semiarid regions: A case study of Syria
【24h】

Comparing methane emissions from different sheep-keeping systems in semiarid regions: A case study of Syria

机译:比较半干旱地区不同养羊系统的甲烷排放量:以叙利亚为例

获取原文
           

摘要

Sheep husbandry represents a significant source of methane (CH"4) in semiarid grassland regions such as Syria. However, the contribution of sheep to CH"4 emissions in Syria is still unknown. This study was designed to quantify CH"4 emissions and identify possible mitigation strategies for their reduction. Methodology developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was used to estimate CH"4 emissions. A survey was conducted on 64 farms from different locations in Syria in 2009. Data were collected concerning sheep-keeping systems (SKSs), body mass, milk and wool yield, farm locations, feed rations, periods of grazing on the Steppe, the duration of pasturing on agricultural residuals and time periods when sheep were kept in stables. Using a linear statistical model, the influence of SKS, geographical region and sheep body mass on emitted CH"4 were analysed. The results showed that the geographical region, SKS and sheep body mass had significant effects (P<0.05) on CH"4 emissions. According to the model, the mean values of estimated CH"4 emissions from extensive, semi-intensive and intensive SKSs were 26+/-0.9, 22.5+/-1.3 and 13.5+/-1.7kg/sheepyear, respectively. In comparing differences between the least square means of CH"4 emissions, the extensive and semi-intensive SKSs produced 92% and 66% higher CH"4 emissions compared to intensive SKS. The differences in CH"4 emissions within the distinct SKSs were attributed to dietary composition. Extensive SKS used a less concentrated feeding regime (98+/-17day/year) than semi-intensive SKS (114+/-47day/year), and intensive SKS employed concentrated feeding year round. Furthermore, it was observed that sheep with the same body mass produced higher CH"4 emissions in extensive SKS than in semi-intensive and intensive SKSs. Moreover, the semi-intensive SKS occupied more natural pastures than extensive SKS, which caused an overuse of the Steppe. Therefore, an effective mitigation strategy involves the use of more digestible feed, which would be accomplished by increasing the quantity of concentrated feed. Owing to unfavourable farming conditions, low-cost nonconventional feeds such as the residuals of wheat and cotton should be used to improve sheep management practices to reduce Steppe overgrazing in the extensive and semi-intensive SKSs of Syria and other semiarid areas.
机译:在叙利亚等半干旱草原地区,放牧绵羊是甲烷(CH“ 4)的重要来源。但是,在叙利亚,绵羊对CH” 4排放的贡献仍然未知。这项研究旨在量化CH“ 4的排放量,并确定可能的减排策略。政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)开发的方法用于估算CH” 4的排放量。 2009年对叙利亚不同地区的64个农场进行了一项调查。收集的数据涉及绵羊饲养系统(SKS),体重,牛奶和羊毛产量,农场位置,饲料配比,草原放牧时间,持续时间放牧对农业残留物和绵羊饲养在马s中的时间的影响。采用线性统计模型,分析了SKS,地理区域和绵羊体重对CH“ 4排放的影响。结果表明,地理区域,SKS和绵羊体重对CH” 4有显着影响(P <0.05)。排放。根据该模型,来自广泛,半密集和密集SKS的估计的CH“ 4排放平均值分别为26 +/- 0.9、22.5 +/- 1.3和13.5 +/- 1.7kg /羊年。在最小的CH“ 4均方根排放量之间,广泛和半密集型SKS的CH” 4排放量比密集型SKS分别高92%和66%。不同SKS中CH“ 4排放量的差异归因于饮食组成。与半精养的SKS(114 +/- 47天/年)相比,粗养的SKS使用的养分集中度较低(98 +/- 17天/年),而整年的精养SKS使用的养分集中度较低。此外,还观察到,相同体重的绵羊在广泛的SKS中产生的CH“ 4排放量要比半密集和密集的SKS高。此外,半密集的SKS比广泛的SKS占据更多的天然草场,这导致了过度使用因此,有效的减缓策略涉及使用更多易消化的饲料,这可以通过增加浓缩饲料的量来实现,由于不利的耕作条件,应采用低成本的非常规饲料,例如小麦和棉花的残留物。在叙利亚和其他半干旱地区广泛的和半密集的SKS中,用于改善绵羊管理措施以减少草原过度放牧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号