首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association: Association des Bibliotheques de la Sante du Canada. Journal >From ‘Here’ to ‘There’: Social Movements, the Academy and Solidarity Research
【24h】

From ‘Here’ to ‘There’: Social Movements, the Academy and Solidarity Research

机译:从“这里”到“那里”:社会运动,学院和团结研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Increasing numbers of social movement scholars now advocate participatory and collaborative research approaches. These are often premised upon the assertion of a convergence between movement and researcher that implicates the latter in the struggles of the former. Naming this approach “solidarity research”, in this article I identify the components that provide the rationale for its pursuit. As well as affirming movement-researcher solidarity, this rationale also comprises a situated epistemology that asks academics to think reflexively about their research practice, the roles they play, and the interests they serve. This reveals the diverging positionality, of knowledge and interests, that often exists between movements and academics. Such concerns give rise to specific methodological and ethical principles that indicate the importance of negotiating this positionality to successful collaboration. Reflecting on my own experiences trying and sometimes failing to conduct participatory research with transnational agrarian movements, I identify dynamics that enable and constrain the pursuit of such collaborative research within commitments to broader methodological and ethical principles of solidarity.
机译:现在,越来越多的社会运动学者倡导参与式和协作式研究方法。这些通常以运动与研究者之间融合的主张为前提,后者将后者与前者的斗争联系在一起。我将这种方法命名为“团结研究”,在本文中,我确定了提供其追求原理的组成部分。除了申明运动研究者的团结一致之外,这一基本原理还包括一种情境认识论,它要求学者对他们的研究实践,他们所扮演的角色以及他们所服务的利益进行反思。这揭示了运动与学者之间经常存在的知识,兴趣和利益的分歧。这些担忧引起了特定的方法和道德原则,这些原则表明了就成功合作进行谈判的重要性。考虑到我自己的尝试,有时甚至没有进行跨国农业运动的参与性研究的经验,我确定了在对更广泛的团结方法论和道德原则的承诺范围内,能够并限制进行这种合作研究的动力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号