【24h】

Risk ratios and Scanlan’s HRX

机译:风险比和Scanlan的HRX

获取原文
       

摘要

Risk ratios are distribution function tail ratios and are widely used in health disparities research. Let A and D denote advantaged and disadvantaged populations with cdfs F ~( A )( x ) and F ~( D )( x ) respectively, F ~( A )( x )≤ F ~( D )( x ). Consider a selection setting where those selected have x > c a critical value. Scanlan observed in empirical data that as c is lowered the failure ratio F R ( c )= F ~( D )( c )/ F ~( A )( c ) and success ratio S R ( c )=[1? F ~( D )( c )]/[1? F ~( A )( c )] can both be increasing with decreasing c , a surprising result Scanlan calls Heuristic Rule X (HRX). The consequences of HRX for disparities research have not been well understood, and appear to be often ignored. The analytical conditions for HRX to hold have not, heretofore, been proven. In the normal case, HRX holds if the variances are equal. In general, HRX is not a robust condition. Settings and distributional conditions necessary for HRX to hold are discussed, including mixture settings of normal and other variables.
机译:风险比是分布函数的尾部比,广泛用于健康差异研究中。令A和D分别表示cdfs F〜(A)(x)和F〜(D)(x),F〜(A)(x)≤F〜(D)(x)的有利和不利人群。考虑选择设置,其中选择的那些具有x> c临界值。 Scanlan在经验数据中观察到,随着c降低,失败率F R(c)= F〜(D)(c)/ F〜(A)(c)和成功率S R(c)= [1? F〜(D)(c)] / [1? F〜(A)(c)]都可以随着c的减小而增加,这是Scanlan称之为启发式规则X(HRX)的令人惊讶的结果。 HRX对差异研究的影响尚未得到很好的理解,并且似乎经常被忽略。迄今为止,尚未证明HRX的分析条件。在正常情况下,如果方差相等,则HRX成立。通常,HRX并非可靠条件。讨论了保持HRX所需的设置和分配条件,包括正常变量和其他变量的混合设置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号