首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources >Evaluation of Hydraulic Conductivity at Inflection Point of Soil Moisture Characteristic Curve as a Matching Point for some Soil Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity Models
【24h】

Evaluation of Hydraulic Conductivity at Inflection Point of Soil Moisture Characteristic Curve as a Matching Point for some Soil Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity Models

机译:土壤水分特征曲线拟合点土壤水分特性曲线拐点处的水力传导率评估

获取原文
       

摘要

Direct measurement of soil unsaturated hydraulic conductivity (K(h) or K(θ)) is difficult and time-consuming, and often in many applied models, predicting hydraulic conductivity is carried out according to measurements of soil retention curve and saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks). However, using KS as a matching point in many procedures may result in over-estimation of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity in dry regions. Therefore, the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity at inflection point of retention curve (Ki) and Ks was used as a matching point to predict K(h). For measurement of K(h), 30 soil samples were collected based on variety of soil texture (8 texture classes from sandy to clay) and other chemical and physical properties. In addition to Ks, K(θ) values of undisturbed samples were measured using multi-step outflow method at matric suctions of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5 0.7, 1 bar and inflection point of retention curve by using hanging water column and pressure plate. Then, the measured K(h), and water diffusivity (D(θ)) values were compared to the predicted values of van Genuchten and Brooks and Corey models (with Mualem and Burdine constraint). The results showed that for 80% of the samples, the van Genuchten–Mualem model with Ki was the best model for predicting K(h) (i.e. using Ki as a matching point in the van Genuchten–Mualem model resulted in best fitting to measured data). Also, in 6.7 % of samples (two sandy clay samples), Brooks and Corey-Mualem model with Ki and in 13.3 % soil samples (2 silty clay and 2 silty clay loam samples), van Genouchten–Mualem model had a best fitting to K(h) measured data. Furthermore, in 20 % samples (4 clay loam, and 2 silt loam textures), the accuracy and efficiency of van Genuchten–Mualem with Ki and van Genuchten–Mualem models in predicting K(h) were almost similar. According to t-Student test, the mean of RMSE and GSDER of van Genuchten–Mualem model with Ki was significantly less than van Genuchten–Mualem model at P Scientific Publications Commission - Health Ministry Scientific Publications Commission - Science Ministry Yektaweb Company Site Keywords ?????, Academic Journal, Scientific Article, ???? ????? ??, ???? ????? ??, ???? ????? ??, ???? ????? ??, ???? ????? ??, ???? ????? ??, ???? ?? Vote ? 2015 All Rights Reserved | JWSS - Isfahan University of Technology
机译:直接测量土壤非饱和导水率(K(h)或K(θ))既困难又费时,并且经常在许多应用模型中,根据土壤保持力曲线和饱和导水率的测量值来预测导水率( KS)。但是,在许多程序中使用KS作为匹配点可能会导致高估干燥地区的非饱和水力传导率。因此,保留曲线(Ki)和Ks拐点处的不饱和水力传导率被用作预测K(h)的匹配点。为了测量K(h),根据土壤质地的不同(从沙质到粘土的8种质地类别)以及其他化学和物理特性收集了30个土壤样品。除了Ks以外,还使用多步流出法通过悬空水柱和压力板在基质吸力为0.1、0.2、0.3、0.5 0.7、1 bar和保留曲线拐点的情况下,通过多步流出法测量了未扰动样品的K(θ)值。 。然后,将测量的K(h)和水扩散率(D(θ))值与van Genuchten和Brooks和Corey模型(具有Mualem和Burdine约束)的预测值进行比较。结果表明,对于80%的样本,带有Ki的van Genuchten-Mualem模型是预测K(h)的最佳模型(即,在Ki-van Genuchten-Mualem模型中使用Ki作为匹配点可以最适合测量数据)。另外,在6.7%的样本(两个砂质粘土样本)中,使用Ki的Brooks和Corey-Mualem模型以及13.3%的土壤样本(2个粉质黏土和2个粉质黏土壤土样本)中,van Genouchten-Mualem模型最适合K(h)测量数据。此外,在20%的样本(4种粘土壤土和2种粉壤土质地)中,van Genuchten-Mualem和Ki和van Genuchten-Mualem模型在预测K(h)方面的准确性和效率几乎相似。根据t学生测试,van Genuchten-Mualem模型与Ki的RMSE和GSDER的平均值明显小于P科学出版委员会-卫生部科学出版委员会-科学部Yektaweb公司的van Genuchten-Mualem模型。关键词???,学术期刊,科学文章,??? ?????? ??,???? ?????? ??,???? ?????? ??,???? ?????? ??,???? ?????? ??,???? ?????? ??,???? ??投票吗? 2015版权所有| JWSS-伊斯法罕工业大学

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号