首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Chinese Medical Association: JCMA >Comparison of a minimally invasive technique with open tension band wiring for displaced transverse patellar fractures
【24h】

Comparison of a minimally invasive technique with open tension band wiring for displaced transverse patellar fractures

机译:开放张力带导线微创技术治疗for骨移位骨折的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Open reduction and internal fixation with tension band wire is the standard treatment for displaced transverse patellar fractures. Recently, some minimally invasive techniques have been proposed as possible alternative methods. This retrospective study compared a newly reported percutaneous osteosynthesis with conventional open method for the treatment of displaced transverse patellar fractures. Methods: The minimally invasive technique was performed by percutaneous osteosynthesis with modified Carpenter’s (POMC) technique, using figure-eight wiring through two-paired cannulated screws under the control of arthroscopy and fluoroscopy. The conventional open surgery was performed with open modified anterior tension band (OMATB) technique. Totally 60 displaced transverse fractures were included in our study. Twenty were treated with percutaneous technique and 40 with open method. Outcome assessment included analysis of radiographic images, range of motion, Lysholm scores, complications, and reoperations. Results: Mean follow-up was 37.3 months. Comparison of POMC and OMATB groups showed statistically significant results as follows: shorter surgical time, 70.4?±?12.5 minutes for POMC group; greater degrees of flexion, 140.4?±?6.1 for POMC group; better total range of motion, 139.6?±?8.2 for POMC group; higher Lysholm scores, 93.6?±?3.1 for POMC group. Frequencies of total complications and reoperations were significantly lower in POMC group. Conclusion: POMC method was a reproducibly reliable method, offering better functional outcome, lower incidence of complications, and reoperations, as compared with standard OMATB group for transverse patellar fractures. Nevertheless, it is not recommended for severely comminuted fractures.
机译:背景:切开复位和张力带内固定是移位的transverse骨骨折的标准治疗方法。最近,已经提出了一些微创技术作为可能的替代方法。这项回顾性研究比较了新近报道的经皮骨合成术与常规开放式方法治疗移位的transverse骨横向骨折。方法:微创技术是通过经改良的Carpenter(POMC)技术经皮骨合成术进行的,在关节镜和荧光镜检查的控制下,通过两对空心螺钉使用八字形布线。常规的开放手术采用开放式改良前张力带(OMATB)技术进行。我们的研究总共包括60个移位的横向骨折。经皮技术治疗20例,开放法40例。结果评估包括射线照相图像分析,运动范围,Lysholm评分,并发症和再次手术。结果:平均随访时间为37.3个月。 POMC与OMATB组的比较显示出统计学上的显着结果,如下所示:手术时间更短,POMC组为70.4±12.5分钟。较大的屈曲度,POMC组为140.4±0.1。总运动范围更好,POMC组为139.6±±8.2; Lysholm评分较高,POMC组为93.6±3.1。 POMC组的总并发症发生率和再手术率均显着降低。结论:与标准的OMATB组相比,POMC方法是一种可重复使用的可靠方法,与标准的OMATB组相比,它具有更好的功能预后,并发症的发生率和再次手术率更高。但是,不建议将其用于严重粉碎的骨折。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号