首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law >Forensic Applications of Cerebral Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
【24h】

Forensic Applications of Cerebral Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

机译:脑单光子发射计算机断层扫描在轻度颅脑损伤中的法医学应用

获取原文
           

摘要

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a substantial source of mortality and morbidity world wide. Although most such injuries are relatively mild, accurate diagnosis and prognostication after mild TBI are challenging. These problems are complicated further when considered in medicolegal contexts, particularly civil litigation. Cerebral single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) may contribute to the evaluation and treatment of persons with mild TBI. Cerebral SPECT is relatively sensitive to the metabolic changes produced by TBI. However, such changes are not specific to this condition, and their presence on cerebral SPECT imaging does not confirm a diagnosis of mild TBI. Conversely, the absence of abnormalities on cerebral SPECT imaging does not exclude a diagnosis of mild TBI, although such findings may be of prognostic value. The literature does not demonstrate consistent relationships between SPECT images and neuropsychological testing or neuropsychiatric symptoms. Using the rules of evidence shaped by Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , and its progeny to analyze the suitability of SPECT for forensic purposes, we suggest that expert testimony regarding SPECT findings should be admissible only as evidence to support clinical history, neuropsychological test results, and structural brain imaging findings and not as stand-alone diagnostic data.
机译:颅脑外伤(TBI)是世界范围内死亡率和发病率的重要来源。尽管大多数此类损伤是相对轻度的,但轻度TBI后准确的诊断和预后仍具有挑战性。在法医学环境中,尤其是在民事诉讼中,这些问题变得更加复杂。脑单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)可能有助于轻度TBI患者的评估和治疗。脑SPECT对TBI产生的代谢变化相对敏感。但是,此类变化并非特定于这种情况,并且它们在脑SPECT成像中的存在不能确认对轻度TBI的诊断。相反,尽管脑部SPECT成像没有异常,但不能排除诊断为轻度TBI,尽管这种发现可能具有预后价值。文献没有证明SPECT图像与神经心理测试或神经精神症状之间的一致性关系。使用Daubert诉Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals,Inc.及其后代形成的证据规则来分析SPECT在法医学上的适用性,我们建议有关SPECT发现的专家证词仅可作为支持临床历史,神经心理学的证据测试结果和结构性脑成像结果,而不是作为独立的诊断数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号