首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Sports Science and Medicine >Effects of Plyometric Training on Neuromuscular Performance in Youth Basketball Players: A Pilot Study on the Influence of Drill Randomization
【24h】

Effects of Plyometric Training on Neuromuscular Performance in Youth Basketball Players: A Pilot Study on the Influence of Drill Randomization

机译:体能训练对青少年篮球运动员神经肌肉性能的影响:演习随机化影响的初步研究

获取原文
       

摘要

The aim of this single-blind randomized controlled trial was to compare the effects of plyometric jump training (PJT), with (RG) and without (NRG) between-session drill randomization, on performance measures (i.e., jumping and sprinting abilities, change of direction speed, and technical performance) in youth male basketball players (age, 10.2 ± 1.7 years), assigned to either the NRG (n = 7), RG (n = 6), or control group (n = 6). Before and after the intervention, countermovement jump, 20-cm drop jump, 30-m sprint (with or without ball dribbling), and change-of-direction speed tests were completed. The PJT was applied twice per week for seven weeks. The only difference between PJT groups was the order of drill execution. An ANOVA was used to detect differences between study groups. The analyses revealed significant main effects of time (all p<.01; d = 0.64-0.89) and group x time interaction (all p<.05; d=0.31-51) for all examined variables. Post hoc analyses revealed moderate-large significant improvements for the RG (countermovement jump: 18.8%, d = 0.6; 20-cm drop jump: 23.9%, d = 0.80; 30-m sprint: 11.6%, d = 1.13; 30-m sprint with ball dribbling: 9.3%, d = 0.54; change of direction speed test: 14.6%, d = 1.82). In contrast, post hoc analyses revealed only small improvements for the NRG (20-cm drop jump: 14.1%, d = 0.36; 30-m sprint: 6.8%, d = 0.45; 30-m sprint with ball dribbling: 8.8%, d = 0.35; change of direction speed test: 10.5%, d = 0.49). Application of PJT without randomization is effective for improving physical and technical qualities. However, PJT could be more beneficial when executed with between-session randomization of drills.
机译:这项单盲随机对照试验的目的是比较在两次课间练习之间进行带(RG)和不带(NRG)的等高线跳跃训练(PJT)对性能指标(即跳跃和冲刺能力,改变青年男子篮球运动员(年龄为10.2±1.7岁)的方向速度和技术性能的指标,分为NRG(n = 7),RG(n = 6)或对照组(n = 6)。干预前后,完成了反向运动跳跃,20 cm的下降跳跃,30 m的短跑(带或不带球运球)以及方向变化速度测试。每周两次应用PJT,共七个星期。 PJT组之间的唯一区别是演练的执行顺序。方差分析用于检测研究组之间的差异。分析显示,对于所有检查的变量,时间(所有p <.01; d = 0.64-0.89)和组x时间交互作用(所有p <.05; d = 0.31-51)具有显着的主要影响。事后分析显示,RG的运动幅度有较大改善(反跳率:18.8%,d = 0.6; 20厘米跌幅:23.9%,d = 0.80; 30米冲刺:11.6%,d = 1.13; 30-带球运球的m sprint:9.3%,d = 0.54;方向速度测试:14.6%,d = 1.82)。相比之下,事后分析显示,NRG仅有很小的改善(20厘米下降跳高:14.1%,d = 0.36; 30米冲刺:6.8%,d = 0.45; 30米冲刺带球运球:8.8%, d = 0.35;方向速度测试变化:10.5%,d = 0.49)。不随机分配PJT可以有效提高身体和技术素质。但是,当使用演习的会话间随机执行时,PJT可能会更有益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号