首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Research in Dental Sciences >A Comparative Review of the Compliance Rate of Abstracts Keywords of Iranian Dental Latin Journals Articles and their American Peers Indexed in PubMed with MeSH 2014
【24h】

A Comparative Review of the Compliance Rate of Abstracts Keywords of Iranian Dental Latin Journals Articles and their American Peers Indexed in PubMed with MeSH 2014

机译:2014年MeSH发表的《伊朗牙科拉丁期刊文章及其美国同行索引摘要关键词的符合率比较》

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction: Selection of index keywords through MeSH (Medical subject Headings) is one of the requirements set by international standards, in writing articles for medical journals. Therefore, the study has been performed with the aim of specifying and comparing level of compliance through MeSH-2014, between those keywords extracted from the abstracts of those articles published in Iranian and American dental journals, which have been indexed in PubMed.Material and Methods: The study was an applied-descriptive one. In total, 1191 keywords extracted from 290 articles from amongst four selected Iranian journals, and 1207 keywords extracted from 203 articles from amongst 2 selected American journals have been compared with MeSH, and divided into three “exact match”, “relative match”, and “no match” groups. Data were analyzed, applying descriptive and inferential statistics (frequency percentage, and Chi-square).Results: There was no significant difference between ratios of the keywords with “exact match”, “relative match”, and “no match”, in selected Iranian and American journals. Most of the keywords in those articles published in Iranian journals were stemmed jointly from the “title and abstract”; however, in American journals, these keywords were mostly stemmed from the “text, references, or authors’ mentalities”. The superior journal from amongst reviewed journals was J Dent (Tehran), in terms of quality of the keywords.Conclusion: As far as the authors’ knowledge for selection of keywords in both groups, and in terms of recognizing preferred terms existing in MeSH is concerned, both groups are far from desirable level. The issue requires more attention to be paid to the value of index words, indices, and the importance of indexing, by both groups of authors. Moreover, the matter should be considered by editorial boards of journals; so that, through more qualitative valuation of all aspects of the articles especially keywords, increase would be made in level of accessibility to the articles, and also citing them as an evidence.
机译:简介:在撰写医学期刊文章时,通过MeSH(医学主题词)选择索引关键字是国际标准确定的要求之一。因此,进行这项研究的目的是指定并比较通过MeSH-2014从伊朗和美国牙科杂志上发表的文章摘要中摘录的那些关键词,这些关键词已在PubMed中进行了索引。 :该研究是应用描述性研究。总共,从伊朗的四种精选期刊中的290篇文章中提取了1191个关键词,以及从美国两种精选期刊中的203篇文章中提取了1207个关键词,与MeSH进行了比较,分为“完全匹配”,“相对匹配”和“完全匹配”三种。 “不匹配”组。应用描述性和推论统计(频率百分比和卡方)对数据进行分析。结果:在选择的关键字中,“完全匹配”,“相对匹配”和“不匹配”的关键字比率之间没有显着差异伊朗和美国期刊。伊朗期刊上发表的这些文章中的大多数关键字都是源于“标题和摘要”;但是,在美国期刊中,这些关键字主要源自“文本,参考文献或作者的心态”。就关键词的质量而言,在评审期刊中,最好的期刊是J Dent(德黑兰)。结论:就作者在两组中选择关键词的知识以及在识别MeSH中存在的首选术语方面而言,都是在这方面,这两个群体都远没有达到理想的水平。两组作者都需要更加关注索引词,索引的价值以及索引的重要性。此外,此事应由期刊编辑委员会审议;因此,通过对文章各个方面(尤其是关键字)进行更定性的评估,可以提高文章的可访问性水平,并以此为依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号