首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Literature and Science >Review of Rachel Crossland’s “What D.H. Lawrence Understood of ‘The Einstein Theory’: Relativity in Fantasia of the Unconscious and Kangaroo ”
【24h】

Review of Rachel Crossland’s “What D.H. Lawrence Understood of ‘The Einstein Theory’: Relativity in Fantasia of the Unconscious and Kangaroo ”

机译:回顾雷切尔·克兰兰(Rachel Crossland)的“爱因斯坦理论对劳伦斯的理解:无意识和袋鼠的幻想曲中的相对论”

获取原文
       

摘要

Crossland's article sets itself two aims: to map Lawrence's engagement with Einstein's theory as it shows itself in Fantasia of the Unconscious (1922) and Kangaroo (1923); and to assert that Lawrence should be more central in surveys of the relation between relativity theory and modernist writing. In terms of the former, Crossland shows clearly that Lawrence did engage with the theories in the early 1920s, although, as she acknowledges, a number of existing case studies have already made this clear. It is not really clear, though, what she is arguing is at stake in this engagement that has not been noticed before. Here, as more generally in the article, a stronger sense of the difference relativity made to Lawrence's writing would have furthered the discussion and substantiated her assertion that he has a vital place in any assessment of its significance to modernism.
机译:克罗斯兰(Crossland)的文章为自己设定了两个目标:将劳伦斯对爱因斯坦理论的参与描绘在爱因斯坦的理论中,《无意识的幻想》(1922)和《袋鼠》(1923)展示了这一点。并且断言劳伦斯在相对论和现代主义写作之间的关系的调查中应该更重要。关于前者,克罗斯兰清楚地表明劳伦斯确实在1920年代初参与了理论研究,尽管正如她所承认的那样,许多现有的案例研究已经阐明了这一点。不过,目前还不清楚,她所争论的是这种参与中从未有过的事情。在这里,就像在文章中更一般地讲的那样,对劳伦斯著作的相对性的更强烈的理解将进一步促进讨论并证实她的主张,即劳伦斯在任何对现代主义意义的评估中都具有至关重要的地位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号