...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare >Quality improvement in clinical documentation: does clinical governance work?
【24h】

Quality improvement in clinical documentation: does clinical governance work?

机译:临床文献质量的提高:临床治理有效吗?

获取原文

摘要

Introduction: The quality of nursing documentation is still a challenge in the nursing profession and, thus, in the health care industry. One major quality improvement program is clinical governance, whose mission is to continuously improve the quality of patient care and overcome service quality problems. The aim of this study was to identify whether clinical governance improves the quality of nursing documentation. Methods: A quasi-experimental method was used to show nursing documentation quality improvement after a 2-year clinical governance implementation. Two hundred twenty random nursing documents were assessed structurally and by content using a valid and reliable researcher made checklist. Results: There were no differences between a nurse's demographic data before and after 2 years (P>0.05) and the nursing documentation score did not improve after a 2-year clinical governance program. Conclusion: Although some efforts were made to improve nursing documentation through clinical governance, these were not sufficient and more attempts are needed.
机译:简介:护理文档的质量仍然是护理行业乃至医疗行业的挑战。临床治理是一项主要的质量改进计划,其宗旨是不断提高患者护理质量并克服服务质量问题。这项研究的目的是确定临床治理是否可以提高护理文献的质量。方法:采用准实验方法显示临床治疗实施2年后护理文献质量的提高。使用有效且可靠的研究人员制作的清单,对220份随机护理文档进行了结构和内容评估。结果:2年前后护士的人口统计学数据之间无差异(P> 0.05),并且经过2年临床管理程序后,护理文献评分没有改善。结论:尽管已做出一些努力通过临床治理来改善护理文献,但是这些努力还不够,需要更多的尝试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号