...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of research practice >Realist Review: Current Practice and Future Prospects
【24h】

Realist Review: Current Practice and Future Prospects

机译:现实主义者的评论:当前的实践和未来的前景

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Realist review has emerged as a specific literature review approach that is concerned with explaining the outcomes of complex intervention programs. We undertook a systematic scoping review to examine the current practice of realist review. A systematic scoping review is a process of mapping the existing evidence base on a particular topic. We identified a growing body of literature using the realist review approach. We selected 54 reviews for our study. These reviews covered a range of topics, including health care, education, management, and public safety. We found that the initial process of exploratory scoping of the literature was described in only 58 per cent of the reviews. The approaches regarding appraisal, analysis, and synthesis of the selected studies were poorly described in most reviews. Overall, there was little uniformity and transparency regarding many methodological issues. Specific methodological guidance may need to be developed if realist reviews are to have a more uniform and transparent approach.
机译:现实主义者的评论已成为一种具体的文献评论方法,该方法与解释复杂干预计划的结果有关。我们进行了系统的范围界定审查,以检查现实主义者审查的当前实践。系统的范围界定审查是根据特定主题映射现有证据的过程。我们使用现实主义者的审查方法确定了越来越多的文学作品。我们选择了54条评论进行研究。这些审查涵盖了一系列主题,包括医疗保健,教育,管理和公共安全。我们发现,只有58%的评论描述了探索性研究范围的最初过程。在大多数评论中,关于所选研究的评估,分析和综合的方法描述得很少。总体而言,在许多方法论问题上几乎没有统一性和透明性。如果要使现实主义者的评论具有更统一和透明的方法,则可能需要制定具体的方法学指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号