首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Lithic Studies >The organization of basanite bifacial production at Giv’at Kipod Quarry, Israel: Towards an ‘Alyawara Day’ model of extraction
【24h】

The organization of basanite bifacial production at Giv’at Kipod Quarry, Israel: Towards an ‘Alyawara Day’ model of extraction

机译:以色列Kipod Quarry的Giv’的Basanite双面生产组织:走向“ Alyawara Day”开采模型

获取原文
       

摘要

Hunter gatherers as well as farmers used a variety of lithic raw materials to shape their world, in which some were perceived as having symbolic or mythical content. While the anthropological literature demonstrates that the extraction of raw materials of special significance was often performed differently from that of other more 'ordinary' raw materials, identifying this in the archaeological record is difficult. In this paper we wish to shed new light on this topic using the Late Neolithic-Early Chalcolithic basanite bifacial tool production site of Giv?at Kipod, Israel. In the southern Levant basalt axes and adzes have long been understood to embody greater symbolic content than the flint axes and adzes that dominate the Neolithic and Chalcolithic bifacial assemblages. By comparing the results from our excavations at the site of Giv?at Kipod to other production and extraction sites we exhibit how the organization of production was different than that related to the more common flint extraction in the region. While at most production and extractions sites the manufacture of various types of items is documented and the presence of tools, especially ad hoc tools, indicates that a variety of activities were performed at the locale of extraction, in the case of Giv?at Kipod the production was focused solely on the manufacture of bifacials with a marked lack of evidence of other significant activities. We attempt to provide guidelines to characterize different exploitation patterns between raw materials of varied social significance using these differences.
机译:猎人的采集者和农民使用各种石器材料来塑造他们的世界,其中一些被认为具有象征性或神话色彩。尽管人类学文献表明,具有特殊意义的原材料的提取通常与其他“普通”原材料的提取方法不同,但在考古记录中很难识别出来。在本文中,我们希望使用位于以色列基波德(Giv?)的晚新石器时代-早古石器时代的重晶石双面工具生产基地,对该主题进行探讨。在南部黎凡特,玄武岩的轴和岩壁被认为比象征新石器时代和黄铜矿的双面组合的火石轴和岩壁具有更大的象征意义。通过比较基波德(Gipod)吉维德(Giv?at)站点与其他生产和提取站点的挖掘结果,我们展示了生产组织与该地区更常见的fl石提取相关的组织。尽管在大多数生产和提取地点记录了各种物品的制造,并且工具(尤其是临时工具)的存在表明在提取现场进行了各种活动,例如,Giv?at Kipod生产仅集中在双面材料的制造上,而缺乏其他重要活动的证据。我们试图提供准则,以利用这些差异来表征具有不同社会意义的原材料之间的不同开采方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号