首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Literature and Science >Review of Tom Furniss’s ‘A Romantic Geology: James Hutton’s 1788 Theory of the Earth’
【24h】

Review of Tom Furniss’s ‘A Romantic Geology: James Hutton’s 1788 Theory of the Earth’

机译:评论汤姆·弗尼斯(Tom Furniss)的“浪漫的地质:詹姆斯·赫顿(James Hutton)的1788年地球理论”

获取原文
       

摘要

In "A Romantic Geology," Tom Furniss deftly analyses James Hutton's Theory of the Earth and suggests its influence on Romantic poets such as Wordsworth and Coleridge. The author thus explores the fascinating "interplay between geological speculation and the aesthetic experience and theory of the sublime." (305) More precisely, Furniss claims that Hutton's theory could be considered as "Romantic" because, on the one hand, it provides a Wordsworthian representation of nature and of the Earth and, on the other, it reveals what Noah Heringman labelled as "geological sublime", i.e. " a geo-category that was common to the aesthetic geology and geological aesthetics of the period and that impacted on the first generation of Romantic poets." (307) By connecting Hutton's geological research with the philosophical notions of space, time and nature expressed by Romantic poets, Furniss specifically puts forward the mutual and fertile relationship between science and literature in "Romantic culture," so as to reflect on the prominent and less-explored influence of scientific progress on Poetry: "what we call 'Romantic science' cannot be seen merely as the backdrop or foil to Romantic poetry but as part of a much more extensive Romantic cultural formation that has more continuities with the Enlightenment project than is usually recognised." (307, my emphasis)
机译:在《浪漫地质学》中,汤姆·弗尼斯(Tom Furniss)巧妙地分析了詹姆斯·赫顿(James Hutton)的《地球理论》,并提出了其对浪漫诗人如华兹华斯和科尔德里奇的影响。因此,作者探索了令人着迷的“地质推测与崇高美学经验和理论之间的相互作用”。 (305)更确切地说,弗尼斯(Furniss)声称赫顿的理论可以被认为是“浪漫的”,因为,一方面,它提供了自然和地球的华兹华斯式表述;另一方面,它揭示了诺亚·赫林曼(Noah Heringman)所说的“地质崇高”,即“该时期的审美地质和地质美学所共有的地理类别,并且影响了第一代浪漫主义诗人。” (307)弗尼斯(Furniss)通过将赫顿的地质研究与浪漫主义诗人表达的空间,时间和自然的哲学观念联系起来,特别提出了“浪漫文化”中科学与文学之间的相互和肥沃的关系,以反映出突出和突出的内容。科学进步对诗歌的影响研究较少:“我们所谓的“浪漫科学”不能仅仅视为浪漫主义诗歌的背景或挫败,而应视为更广泛的浪漫主义文化形态的一部分,与启蒙运动相比,浪漫主义文化具有更多的延续性。通常被认可。” (307,我的重点)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号