...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Project Management >A game theory approach for competition and cooperation among project’s subcontractors with interaction activities
【24h】

A game theory approach for competition and cooperation among project’s subcontractors with interaction activities

机译:博弈论方法用于项目分包商之间通过互动活动进行竞争与合作

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Some projects are often performed by many subcontractors that cooperate with each other and some of them are conducted by outsourcing them to several firms; so subcontractors carry out activities in competition. Appropriate trade-off between time and cost and achieving more benefit and cost saving are objectives of both models. In this paper, it is investigated that how different subcontractors of a project can cooperate to achieve more advantages if possible and how sub-contractors can compete to make the results better and find the optimum cost to minimize the time for each of them. The competition here does not mean eliminating a competitor, but the aim is to challenge the contractors in order to choose the best decision. The purpose of this study is to address the challenges in time and cost management and to find more profit allocation among subcontractors and fair competition for fair allocation as well. A model based on cooperative game theory in time/cost trade-off problem of projects is suggested and then a competition model among subcontractors based on non-cooperative game theory is proposed. A case study is rep-resented to comprehensively illustrate the problem, the cooperative techniques of cooperative game theory, and the payoff matrix of non-cooperative model among subcontractors. Results of the proposed model reveal that subcontractors can obtain higher profit from cooperation if pos-sible. When they outsource the project and compete with each other, they must consider the in-teraction activities and choose the best strategies for cost saving and gain more reward from the client. Moreover, it is found that some techniques such as Shapley value, Core, Max-Min Core, or Equal Profit Method (EPM) are able to fairly assign extra profit of cooperation, and using the payoff matrix, Nash equilibrium, and Nash bargaining helps to find the optimum point to mini-mize time and cost for interaction activities state.
机译:有些项目通常是由许多相互合作的分包商执行的,而有些则是通过将它们外包给几家公司来完成的;因此,分包商开展竞争活动。两种模型的目标都是在时间和成本之间进行适当的权衡,以及获得更多的收益和节省成本。在本文中,我们研究了项目的不同分包商如何可以合作以实现更多优势(如果可能),以及分包商如何可以竞争以使结果更好,并找到最佳成本以最大程度地缩短每个分包商的时间。这里的竞争并不意味着要淘汰竞争对手,而是要挑战承包商以选择最佳决策。这项研究的目的是解决时间和成本管理方面的挑战,并在分包商和公平竞争中寻求更多的利润分配。提出了一种基于合作博弈的项目时间/成本权衡问题模型,然后提出了基于非合作博弈的分包商竞争模型。本文以案例研究为例,对分包商之间的问题,合作博弈理论的合作技巧以及非合作模型的收益矩阵进行了全面的阐述。该模型的结果表明,如果可能,分包商可以从合作中获得更高的利润。当他们外包项目并相互竞争时,他们必须考虑互动活动,并选择最佳策略以节省成本并从客户那里获得更多回报。此外,还发现诸如Shapley值,Core,Max-Min Core或Equal Profit Method(EPM)之类的某些技术能够公平分配合作的额外利润,并且使用收益矩阵,Nash均衡和Nash讨价还价有助于找到最佳点,以最大程度地减少交互活动状态的时间和成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号