...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pollination Ecology >Pollen Removal and Deposition by Pollen- and Nectar-Collecting Specialist and Generalist Bee Visitors to Iliamna bakeri (Malvaceae)
【24h】

Pollen Removal and Deposition by Pollen- and Nectar-Collecting Specialist and Generalist Bee Visitors to Iliamna bakeri (Malvaceae)

机译:花粉和花蜜采集专家和普通蜜蜂访花粉者对Iliamna bakeri(锦葵科)的花粉去除和沉积

获取原文
           

摘要

Up to 60% of the bee species of a region are oligolectic; they collect pollen only from a closely related group of plants though nectar-collecting choices are often broader. Bee specialists are expected to be superior to generalists in gathering pollen from their host plants and perhaps in transferring pollen to host stigmas. We used the oligolege Diadasia nitidifrons and its pollen-host Iliamna bakeri to ask if specialists 1) were more efficient than generalists as pollen-collectors? 2) deposited more pollen on stigmas than generalists? and 3) if pollen-collectors removed and deposited more pollen than did nectar-collectors. We found support for the first and third hypotheses. Diadasia pollen- and nectar-collectors removed more pollen per flower-visit than did their primary generalist competitors (Agapostemon spp.). The superior pollen-gathering efficiency of Diadasia exceeded differences that might be attributed to size: although Agapostemon females are, on average, 12.5% smaller than Diadasia females, pollen-collecting Agapostemon left 22.9% more pollen in flowers than did Diadasia. We found no difference between taxa in time spent foraging on a single flower. Diadasia and Agapostemon pollen-collectors deposited significantly more pollen on I. bakeri stigmas than did nectar-collectors; there was no difference between taxa in pollen deposition. Diadasia was superior to generalists as a pollinator in two ways: Diadasia was 1) a more reliable presence in I. bakeri populations; and 2) always most abundant at I. bakeri flowers. The association between D. nitidifrons and I. bakeri appears to be another example of a highly specialised bee affiliated with an unspecialised host-plant.
机译:一个地区多达60%的蜜蜂是寡聚的;他们仅从一组密切相关的植物中收集花粉,尽管通常会更广泛地选择花蜜。在从寄主植物中收集花粉以及将花粉转移到寄主柱头上方面,预计蜜蜂专家将比通才专家优越。我们使用寡核苷酸Diadasia nitidifrons及其花粉宿主Iliamna bakeri来询问专家1)作为花粉采集者是否比通才更有效? 2)花粉在花粉上的存留量比通才多。 3)如果花粉采集器比花蜜采集器去除并沉积更多的花粉。我们发现了对第一个和第三个假设的支持。与主要的通才竞争者相比,Diadasia花粉和花蜜采集者每次花访时去除的花粉量更多(Agapostemon spp。)。蛇纹石的较高的花粉采集效率超过了可能归因于大小的差异:尽管Agapostemon雌虫平均比Diadasia雌虫小12.5%,但收集花粉的Agapostemon的花粉比Diadasia多了22.9%。我们发现,在单朵花上觅食的时间上,分类单元之间没有区别。与花蜜采集者相比,Diadasia和Agapostemon花粉采集者在面包房柱头上的花粉沉积量要多得多。花粉沉积的分类单元之间没有差异。 Diadasia在两个方面比授粉媒介要强于通才:Diadasia是1)在面包酵母中更可靠的存在; 2)总是在面包花中最丰富。 D. nitidifrons和I. bakeri之间的关联似乎是高度专业化蜜蜂与非专业寄主植物相关联的另一个例子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号