首页> 外文期刊>Journal of physiotherapy >Perioperative pelvic floor muscle training did not improve outcomes in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a randomised trial
【24h】

Perioperative pelvic floor muscle training did not improve outcomes in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a randomised trial

机译:接受盆腔器官脱垂手术的妇女围手术期盆底肌肉训练不能改善结局:一项随机试验

获取原文
           

摘要

QuestionIn women undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), what is the average effect of the addition of perioperative pelvic floor muscle training on pelvic organ prolapse symptoms, pelvic floor muscle strength, quality of life, sexual function and perceived improvement after surgery?DesignRandomised controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessors, and intention-to-treat analysis.ParticipantsNinety-six women with an indication for POP surgery.InterventionThe experimental group received a 9-week pelvic floor muscle training protocol with four sessions before the surgery and seven sessions after the surgery. The control group received surgery only.Outcome measuresSymptoms were assessed using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), which is scored from 0 ‘unaffected’ to 300 ‘worst affected’. Secondary outcomes were assessed using vaginal manometry, validated questionnaires and Patient Global Impression of Improvement, which is scored from 1 ‘very much better’ to 7 ‘very much worse’. All participants were evaluated 15 days before surgery, and at Days 40 and 90 after surgery.ResultsThere was no substantial difference in POP symptoms between the experimental and control groups at Day 40 (31 (SD 24) versus 38 (SD 42), adjusted mean difference??6, 95% CI??25 to 13) or Day 90 (27 (SD 27) versus 33 (SD 33), adjusted mean difference??4, 95% CI??23 to 14). The experimental group perceived marginally greater global improvement than the control group; mean difference??0.4 (95% CI??0.8 to??0.1) at Day 90. However, the estimated effect of additional perioperative pelvic floor muscle training was estimated to be not beneficial enough to be considered worthwhile for any other secondary outcomes.ConclusionIn women undergoing POP surgery, additional perioperative pelvic floor muscle training had negligibly small effects on POP symptoms, pelvic floor muscle strength, quality of life or sexual function.Trial registrationReBEC, RBR–29kgz5.
机译:在接受盆腔器官脱垂(POP)手术的女性中,围手术期增加盆腔底肌训练对盆腔器官脱垂症状,盆腔底肌力量,生活质量,性功能和术后知觉改善的平均作用是什么?对照试验,采用隐蔽分配,盲目评估者和意向性治疗分析方法。参加者96例有POP手术指征的妇女干预实验组接受了为期9周的骨盆底肌肉训练方案,其中术前四个疗程,七个疗程手术后。对照组仅接受外科手术。结果测量症状采用骨盆底窘迫评估表(PFDI-20)进行评估,其评分为0(未受影响)至300(最严重受影响)。使用阴道测压法,经验证的问卷和“患者总体改善印象”评估了次要结局,其得分从1分“非常好”到7分“非常差”。在手术前15天,手术后40天和90天对所有参与者进行了评估。结果,实验组和对照组在第40天(31(SD 24)与38(SD 42))之间的POP症状无显着差异。差异Δε6,95%CIΔε23至14)或第90天(27(SD 27)对33(SD 33),校正后的平均差异Δε4,95%CIΔε23至14)。实验组的整体改善比对照组略有提高。在第90天时,平均差异为0.4(95%CI为0.8至0.1)。但是,估计围手术期盆底肌肉额外训练的估计效果并不有益,不足以被认为可用于其他任何继发性结局。结论在进行POP手术的女性中,额外的围手术期骨盆底肌肉训练对POP症状,骨盆底肌肉力量,生活质量或性功能的影响微乎其微。试验注册ReBEC,RBR–29kgz5。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号