首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pain Research >Initiation of labor analgesia with injection of local anesthetic through the epidural needle compared to the catheter
【24h】

Initiation of labor analgesia with injection of local anesthetic through the epidural needle compared to the catheter

机译:与导管相比,通过硬膜外针注射局部麻醉剂开始分娩镇痛

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The rationale for injection of epidural medications through the needle is to promote sooner onset of pain relief relative to dosing through the epidural catheter given that needle injection can be performed immediately after successful location of the epidural space. Some evidence indicates that dosing medications through the epidural needle results in faster onset and improved quality of epidural anesthesia compared to dosing through the catheter, though these dosing techniques have not been compared in laboring women. This investigation was performed to determine whether dosing medication through the epidural needle improves the quality of analgesia, level of sensory blockade, or onset of pain relief measured from the time of epidural medication injection. Methods: In this double-blinded prospective investigation, healthy term laboring women (n=60) received labor epidural placement upon request. Epidural analgesia was initiated according to the assigned randomization group: 10 mL loading dose (0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2?μg/mL) through either the epidural needle or the catheter, given in 5 mL increments spaced 2 minutes apart. Verbal rating scale (VRS) pain scores (0–10) and pinprick sensory levels were documented to determine the rates of analgesic and sensory blockade onset. Results: No significant differences were observed in onset of analgesia or sensory blockade from the time of injection between study groups. The estimated difference in the rate of pain relief (VRS/minute) was 0.04 (95% CI: ?0.01 to 0.11; p =0.109), and the estimated difference in onset of sensory blockade (sensory level/minute) was 0.63 (95% CI: ?0.02 to 0.15; p =0.166). The time to VRS ≤3 and level of sensory block 20 minutes after dosing were also similar between groups. No differences in patient satisfaction, or maternal or fetal complications were observed. Conclusion: This investigation observed that epidural needle and catheter injection of medications result in similar onset of analgesia and sensory blockade, quality of labor analgesia, patient satisfaction, and complication rates.
机译:背景:鉴于可以在成功定位硬膜外腔后立即进行注射,相对于通过硬膜外导管给药,通过针头注射硬膜外药物的理由是促进疼痛的缓解。一些证据表明,与通过导管给药相比,通过硬膜外针给药的药物可更快地发作并改善硬膜外麻醉的质量,尽管这些给药技术尚未在劳动妇女中进行比较。进行这项研究是为了确定从硬膜外注射药物开始,通过硬膜外针头给药的药物是否能改善镇痛的质量,感觉阻滞的水平或减轻疼痛的发作。方法:在这项双盲前瞻性研究中,健康的定期劳动妇女(n = 60)应要求接受了硬膜外分娩。硬膜外镇痛根据分配的随机分组开始:通过硬膜外针头或导管以10 mL负荷剂量(0.125%布比卡因与芬太尼2?μg/ mL)给药,以5 mL的增量间隔2分钟给药。记录了语言评分量表(VRS)的疼痛评分(0-10)和针刺感官水平,以确定镇痛和感觉阻滞的发生率。结果:研究组之间从注射时开始的镇痛或感觉阻滞没有观察到显着差异。疼痛缓解率的估计差异(VRS /分钟)为0.04(95%CI:?0.01至0.11; p = 0.109),感觉障碍发生的估计差异(感官水平/分钟)为0.63(95)。 %CI:≤0.02至0.15; p = 0.166)。给药后20分钟,VRS≤3的时间和感觉阻滞水平也相似。没有观察到患者满意度或产妇或胎儿并发症的差异。结论:这项研究观察到硬膜外针头和导管注射药物会导致相似的镇痛和感觉阻滞发作,分娩镇痛质量,患者满意度和并发症发生率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号