...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation >Comparison of gait biomechanics in patients with and without knee osteoarthritis during different phases of gait
【24h】

Comparison of gait biomechanics in patients with and without knee osteoarthritis during different phases of gait

机译:膝关节骨关节炎和非膝关节骨关节炎在不同步态阶段的步态生物力学比较

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundThis study aimed to characterise knee adduction angles (KAA) and knee adduction moments (KAM) and compare this with foot centre of pressure (COP) in volunteers with and without knee osteoarthritis (OA).MethodsA total of 108 participants were recruited; 84 had no known pathology, 18 had medial knee OA, and six had lateral knee OA. Linear regression was used to determine correlations between the normalised COP, KAM, and KAA during each phase of gait for all participants.ResultsThe first phase of gait demonstrated significant differences between groups for all measures: KAA in all phases, COP in phases one and two, and KAM in phase one only.ConclusionThe largest mechanical changes are seen in the first phase of gait in osteoarthritic patients. Although COP is an easy to measure tool, it is not as sensitive as KAA and did not demonstrate a significant difference between healthy and medial OA patients.
机译:背景这项研究旨在表征膝内收角(KAA)和膝内收力矩(KAM),并将其与有或没有膝骨关节炎(OA)的志愿者的脚压力中心(COP)进行比较。方法共招募了108名参与者; 84例未发现病理学,18例内侧膝OA,6例外侧膝OA。结果采用线性回归方法确定了所有参与者在步态每个阶段的标准化COP,KAM和KAA之间的相关性。结果步态的第一阶段显示了所有指标组之间的显着差异:所有阶段的KAA,第一和第二阶段的COP结论:最大的机械改变发生在骨关节炎患者步态的第一阶段。尽管COP是一种易于测量的工具,但它不如KAA灵敏,并且在健康和内侧OA患者之间也没有显示出显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号