首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pain Research >Efficacy of methylprednisolone versus other pharmacologic interventions for the treatment of central post-stroke pain: a retrospective analysis
【24h】

Efficacy of methylprednisolone versus other pharmacologic interventions for the treatment of central post-stroke pain: a retrospective analysis

机译:甲基强的松龙与其他药物治疗中风后中枢痛的疗效:回顾性分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Purpose: To determine if an oral, tapered methylprednisolone regimen is superior to other commonly used pharmacologic interventions for the treatment of central post-stroke pain (CPSP). Patients and methods: In this study, the charts of 146 stroke patients admitted to acute inpatient rehabilitation were retrospectively reviewed. Patients diagnosed with CPSP underwent further chart review to assess numerical rating scale for pain scores and as-needed pain medication usage at different time points comparing CPSP patients treated with methylprednisolone to those treated with other pharmacologic interventions. Results: In the sample, 8.2% were diagnosed with CPSP during acute care or inpatient rehabilitation. Mean numerical rating scale for pain scores day of symptom onset did not differ between those patients treated with methylprednisolone versus those treated with other pharmacologic interventions (mean ± standard deviation; 6.1 ± 2.3 versus 5.7 ± 1.6, P = 0.77). However, mean numerical rating scale for pain scores differed significantly 1-day after treatment initiation (1.7 ± 2.1 versus 5.0 ± 1.9, P = 0.03) and 1-day prior to rehabilitation discharge (0.3 ± 0.9 versus 4.1 ± 3.2, P = 0.01) between the two groups. Compared to day of symptom onset, as-needed pain medication usage within the methylprednisolone group was marginally less 1-day after treatment initiation (Z = -1.73, P = 0.08) and 1-day prior to rehabilitation discharge (Z = -1.89, P = 0.06). No difference in as-needed pain medication usage existed within the non-steroid group at the same time points. Conclusion: Methylprednisolone is a potential therapeutic option for CPSP. The findings herein warrant study in prospective trials.
机译:目的:确定口服锥形甲基强的松龙方案是否优于其他常用的中枢性中风后疼痛(CPSP)药物治疗。患者和方法:本研究回顾性分析了146例接受急性住院康复治疗的中风患者的病历。诊断为CPSP的患者将接受进一步的图表审查,以评估在不同时间点对甲基泼尼松龙治疗的CPSP患者与其他药物干预治疗的患者的疼痛评分和所需的止痛药使用的数字评分量表。结果:在样本中,有8.2%在急性护理或住院康复期间被诊断出患有CPSP。接受甲泼尼龙治疗的患者与接受其他药物干预的患者之间,症状发作日疼痛评分的平均数字量表没有差异(平均值±标准差; 6.1±2.3; 5.7±1.6,P = 0.77)。但是,疼痛评分的平均数字量表在治疗开始后1天(1.7±2.1对5.0±1.9,P = 0.03)和康复出院前1天(0.3±0.9对4.1±3.2,P = 0.01)有显着差异。 )。与症状发作日相比,甲基强的松龙组在治疗开始后1天(Z = -1.73,P = 0.08)和康复出院前1天(Z = -1.89, P = 0.06)。非类固醇组在同一时间点所需的止痛药使用量没有差异。结论:甲泼尼龙是CPSP的潜在治疗选择。本文的发现值得在前瞻性研究中进行研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号