首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pain Research >Dose-related beneficial and harmful effects of gabapentin in postoperative pain management – post hoc analyses from a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses
【24h】

Dose-related beneficial and harmful effects of gabapentin in postoperative pain management – post hoc analyses from a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses

机译:加巴喷丁在术后疼痛管理中与剂量相关的有益和有害影响–通过荟萃分析和试验性顺序分析进行系统回顾后的事后分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: During the last 15 years, gabapentin has become an established component of postoperative pain treatment. Gabapentin has been employed in a wide range of doses, but little is known about the optimal dose, providing the best balance between benefit and harm. This systematic review with meta-analyses aimed to explore the beneficial and harmful effects of various doses of gabapentin administered to surgical patients. Materials and methods: Data in this paper were derived from an original review, and the subgroup analyses were predefined in an International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews published protocol: PROSPERO (ID: CRD42013006538). The methods followed Cochrane guidelines. The Cochrane Library’s CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, Google Scholar, and FDA database were searched for relevant trials. Randomized clinical trials comparing gabapentin versus placebo were included. Four different dose intervals were investigated: 0–350, 351–700, 701–1050, and >1050 mg. Primary co-outcomes were 24-hour morphine consumption and serious adverse events (SAEs), with emphasis put on trials with low risk of bias. Results: One hundred and twenty-two randomized clinical trials, with 8466 patients, were included. Sixteen were overall low risk of bias. No consistent increase in morphine-sparing effect was observed with increasing doses of gabapentin from the trials with low risk of bias. Analyzing all trials, the smallest and the highest dose subgroups demonstrated numerically the most prominent reduction in morphine consumption. Twenty-seven trials reported 72 SAEs, of which 83% were reported in the >1050 mg subgroup. No systematic increase in SAEs was observed with increasing doses of gabapentin. Conclusion: Data were sparse, and the small number of trials with low risk of bias is a major limitation for firm conclusions. Taking these limitations into account, we were not able to demonstrate a clear relationship between the dosage of gabapentin and opioid-sparing or harmful effects. These subgroup analyses are exploratory and hypothesis-generating for future trialists.
机译:背景:在过去的15年中,加巴喷丁已成为术后疼痛治疗的公认组成部分。加巴喷丁的使用剂量范围很广,但是对于最佳剂量知之甚少,它可以在利弊之间达到最佳平衡。这项带有荟萃分析的系统综述旨在探讨不同剂量加巴喷丁对手术患者的有益和有害作用。材料和方法:本文中的数据来自原始审查,并且亚组分析在已发布的国际系统评价的系统预期登记册PROSPERO(ID:CRD42013006538)中进行了预定义。该方法遵循Cochrane指南。在Cochrane图书馆的CENTRAL,PubMed,EMBASE,Science Citation Index Expanded,Google Scholar和FDA数据库中进行了相关试验的搜索。包括比较加巴喷丁和安慰剂的随机临床试验。研究了四种不同的剂量间隔:0–350、351–700、701–1050和> 1050 mg。主要共同结果是24小时服用吗啡和严重不良事件(SAE),重点放在偏倚风险低的试验上。结果:纳入122项随机临床试验,共8466例患者。总体上偏低的风险为16。在偏倚风险低的试验中,随着加巴喷丁剂量的增加,未观察到吗啡保护作用的持续增加。分析所有试验后,最小和最高剂量亚组在数值上证明了吗啡消耗量的最显着减少。 27项试验报告了72种SAE,其中83%报告于> 1050 mg亚组。随着加巴喷丁剂量的增加,未观察到SAE的系统增加。结论:数据稀疏,且偏倚风险低的少量试验是确定结论的主要限制。考虑到这些局限性,我们无法证明加巴喷丁的剂量与减少阿片类药物或有害作用之间的明确关系。这些亚组分析对于未来的试验者来说是探索性的和假设性的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号