首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pain Research >Intra-articular ozone or hyaluronic acid injection: Which one is superior in patients with knee osteoarthritis? A 6-month randomized clinical trial
【24h】

Intra-articular ozone or hyaluronic acid injection: Which one is superior in patients with knee osteoarthritis? A 6-month randomized clinical trial

机译:关节腔内注射臭氧或透明质酸:在膝骨关节炎患者中哪一种更好?为期6个月的随机临床试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common disease, imposing a great burden through pain and decreased function. There are many therapeutic modalities including non-pharmacologic choices and oral, topical, and intra-articular medications. New studies have shown promising results for ozone application in knee OA. Our aim was to compare the effects of ozone therapy versus hyaluronic acid (HA) intra-articular injection in knee OA patients. Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, a total of 174 patients with more than 3 months of chronic pain or swelling in the knee joints along with consistent imaging findings were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups of HA and ozone, which were planned to undergo 3?weekly injections of HA (Hyalgan?) and 10 mL of a 30 μg/mL ozone solution, respectively. Patients were evaluated at baseline and 6 months after the last injection for pain, stiffness, and function using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire. Results: No major adverse events were detected in this study. Total WOMAC score decreased from 40.8±9.8 to 20.4±4.9 ( p <0.01) in the ozone group and from 38.5±7.9 to 17.1±4.2 ( p <0.01) in the HA group. A similar trend was observed in pain improvement according to VAS. Pain, stiffness, and function significantly improved in both the groups, but no between-group difference was found. Conclusion: Although both ozone and HA can be effectively used for improving function and reducing pain in selected knee OA patients, neither of the two showed any superiority at 6-month follow-up.
机译:目的:膝骨关节炎(OA)是一种常见疾病,会因疼痛和功能下降而造成很大负担。有许多治疗方式,包括非药物选择以及口服,局部和关节内用药。新的研究表明臭氧在膝骨关节炎中的应用前景广阔。我们的目的是比较臭氧治疗与透明质酸(HA)关节内注射在膝OA患者中的效果。方法:在这项随机临床试验中,纳入了174例膝关节慢性疼痛或肿胀超过3个月且影像学表现一致的患者,并将其随机分为两组,分别计划进行HA和臭氧治疗每周3次注射HA(Hyalgan?)和10 mL的30μg/ mL臭氧溶液。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)以及西安大略和麦克马斯特大学关节炎指数(WOMAC)问卷在基线和最后一次注射后6个月对患者进行疼痛,僵硬和功能评估。结果:在这项研究中未发现重大不良事件。臭氧组的WOMAC总评分从40.8±9.8降至20.4±4.9(p <0.01),而HA组从38.5±7.9降至17.1±4.2(p <0.01)。根据VAS,在疼痛改善方面观察到类似趋势。两组的疼痛,僵硬和功能均明显改善,但未发现组间差异。结论:尽管臭氧和HA均可以有效地用于改善部分膝OA患者的功能并减轻其疼痛,但在6个月的随访中,两者均无优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号