首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research >Sensitivity and specificity of posterior and anterior corneal elevation measured by Orbscan in diagnosis of clinical and subclinical keratoconus
【24h】

Sensitivity and specificity of posterior and anterior corneal elevation measured by Orbscan in diagnosis of clinical and subclinical keratoconus

机译:Orbscan测量角膜后和前角膜增高在临床和亚临床圆锥角膜诊断中的敏感性和特异性

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of anterior and posterior corneal elevation parameters as determined by Orbscan II (Bausch and Lomb, Rochester, NY, USA) in discriminating between (sub) clinical keratoconus (KCN) and normal corneas. Methods: This prospective case-control study included 28 eyes with subclinical KCN, 65 with clinical KCN and 141 normal corneas. Anterior and posterior corneal elevation was measured and compared in the central 5-mm corneal zone using Orbscan II. Results: Receiver operating curves (ROC) curve analyses for posterior corneal elevation showed predictive accuracy in both KCN and subclinical KCN with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97 and 0.69, respectively while optimal cutoff points were 51 μm for KCN and 35 μm for subclinical KCN. These values were associated with sensitivity and specificity of 89.23% and 98.58%, respectively, for KCN; and 50.00% and 88.65% for subclinical KCN. ROC curve analyses for anterior corneal elevation showed predictive accuracy in both KCN and subclinical KCN with AUC of 0.97 and 0.69, respectively while optimal cutoff points were 19 μm for KCN and 16 μm for subclinical KCN. These values were associated with sensitivity and specificity of 93.85% and 97.16%, respectively, for KCN; and 60.71% and 87.94% for subclinical KCN. Conclusion: Anterior and posterior corneal elevation data obtained by Orbscan II can well discriminate between KCN and normal corneas, however the reliability of their indices is lower in differentiating subclinical KCN from normal cases.
机译:目的:确定由Orbscan II(Bausch and Lomb,Rochester,NY,美国)确定的前,后角膜抬高参数在区分(亚)临床圆锥角膜(KCN)和正常角膜方面的敏感性和特异性。方法:这项前瞻性病例对照研究包括28眼亚临床KCN,65眼临床KCN和141例正常角膜。使用Orbscan II在5mm角膜中央区域测量并比较了角膜前和后角的高度。结果:接受者操作曲线(ROC)曲线分析后角膜抬高表明,在KCN和亚临床KCN中的预测准确性均在0.97和0.69下,曲线下面积分别为(AUC)51 Km和35μmKoff用于亚临床KCN。这些值分别对KCN的敏感性和特异性分别为89.23%和98.58%。亚临床KCN分别为50.00%和88.65%。 ROC曲线对角膜前部抬高的分析显示KCN和亚临床KCN的预测准确度分别为AUC为0.97和0.69,而KCN的最佳截止点为19μm,亚临床KCN的最佳临界点为16μm。这些值分别对KCN的敏感性和特异性分别为93.85%和97.16%。亚临床KCN分别为60.71%和87.94%。结论:Orbscan II获得的角膜前和后角高程数据可以很好地区分KCN和正常角膜,但在区分亚临床KCN和正常情况下,其指数的可靠性较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号