首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Oncology Practice >Wide Variation in the Diffusion of a New Technology: Practice-Based Trends in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Use in the State of Michigan, With Implications for IMRT Use Nationally
【24h】

Wide Variation in the Diffusion of a New Technology: Practice-Based Trends in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Use in the State of Michigan, With Implications for IMRT Use Nationally

机译:新技术的扩散差异很大:密歇根州基于强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)使用的基于实践的趋势,对全国IMRT的使用产生了影响

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract IMRT use grew significantly across the state of Michigan over time, with four-fold variability among centers, which was related to facility characteristics. Purpose: To characterize the adoption and variation of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) use in the state of Michigan. Methods: As a certificate-of-need state, Michigan requires every radiation oncology facility to report the number of external-beam and IMRT treatments delivered annually. We examined the percentage of treatments delivered using IMRT across centers from 2005 to 2012. We constructed a repeated-measures longitudinal linear regression model to evaluate bivariable and multiple variable associations with IMRT use. Results: The median proportion of treatments delivered with IMRT rose from 16% in 2005 to 42% in 2012. All treatment centers in the state of Michigan possessed the capacity to deliver IMRT as of 2009. The fraction of treatments delivered with IMRT varied between 23% and 96% (standard deviation, 19%) in the lowest- and highest-use centers in 2012. Higher IMRT use was significantly associated with freestanding facilities and year of treatment, with a trend toward higher IMRT use in academic centers and low-volume facilities. Conclusion: IMRT use grew significantly across the state of Michigan over time, with four-fold variability among centers, which was related to facility characteristics. These data provide no indication of an ideal or appropriate level of IMRT use. Rather, the wide variation in IMRT use among centers indicates a lack of consensus regarding the situations in which IMRT provides significant clinical benefit. This supports further research and interventions to ensure that patients receive appropriate care, regardless of where they are treated.
机译:摘要随着时间的推移,IMRT的使用在整个密歇根州显着增长,中心之间的差异四倍,这与设施的特征有关。目的:表征密歇根州调强放射治疗(IMRT)的采用和变化。方法:作为需要证明的州,密歇根州要求每家放射肿瘤学设施报告每年进行的外部束和IMRT治疗的数量。我们研究了2005年至2012年跨中心使用IMRT进行治疗的百分比。我们构建了重复测量纵向线性回归模型,以评估与IMRT使用相关的双变量和多变量关联。结果:采用IMRT进行治疗的中位比例从2005年的16%上升到2012年的42%。截至2009年,密歇根州的所有治疗中心都具有实施IMRT的能力。采用IMRT进行治疗的比例在23 2012年使用率最低和使用最高的中心所占的百分比分别为96%和96%(标准差,标准偏差为19%)。IMRT的较高使用与独立式设施和治疗年份显着相关,学术中心和IMRT的使用率呈较低趋势大量的设施。结论:随着时间的推移,整个密歇根州对IMRT的使用显着增长,中心之间的差异四倍,这与设施的特征有关。这些数据没有提供IMRT使用理想水平或适当水平的指示。相反,各中心之间IMRT使用的广泛差异表明,对于IMRT提供重大临床益处的情况,人们缺乏共识。这为进一步的研究和干预提供了支持,以确保无论患者在何处接受治疗,都可以得到适当的护理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号