首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Natural Science Biology and Medicine >Comparative evaluation of endodontic pressure syringe, insulin syringe, jiffy tube, and local anesthetic syringe in obturation of primary teeth: An in vitro study
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of endodontic pressure syringe, insulin syringe, jiffy tube, and local anesthetic syringe in obturation of primary teeth: An in vitro study

机译:牙髓压力注射器,胰岛素注射器,僵硬管和局麻药在乳牙结扎中的比较评估:一项体外研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare four methods of root canal obturation in primary teeth using conventional radiography. Materials and Methods: A total of 96 root canals of primary molars were prepared and obturated with zinc oxide eugenol. Obturation methods compared were endodontic pressure syringe, insulin syringe, jiffy tube, and local anesthetic syringe. The root canal obturations were evaluated by conventional radiography for the length of obturation and presence of voids. The obtained data were analyzed using Chi-square test. Results: The results showed significant differences between the four groups for the length of obturation (P Conclusions: Endodontic pressure syringe produced the best results in terms of length of obturation and controlling paste extrusion from the apical foramen. However, insulin syringe and local anesthetic syringe can be used as effective alternative methods.
机译:目的:这项体外研究的目的是比较使用常规放射线照相术对乳齿中的四种根管阻塞方法。材料与方法:总共准备了96个初级磨牙的根管,并用氧化锌丁香酚封闭。比较的充填方法为牙髓压力注射器,胰岛素注射器,僵硬管和局部麻醉剂注射器。通过常规放射线照相术评估牙根管的闭塞长度和空隙的存在。使用卡方检验分析获得的数据。结果:结果显示,四组患者的闭孔时间长短有显着差异(P结论:牙髓压力注射器在闭孔时间长短和控制根尖孔挤出糊剂方面取得了最佳结果。但是,胰岛素注射器和局麻药注射器可以用作有效的替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号