首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neuroinflammation >Micronized/ultramicronized palmitoylethanolamide displays superior oral efficacy compared to nonmicronized palmitoylethanolamide in a rat model of inflammatory pain
【24h】

Micronized/ultramicronized palmitoylethanolamide displays superior oral efficacy compared to nonmicronized palmitoylethanolamide in a rat model of inflammatory pain

机译:在炎症性疼痛的大鼠模型中,微粉化/超微粉化的棕榈酰乙醇酰胺比非微粉化的棕榈酰乙醇酰胺具有更好的口服功效

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The fatty acid amide palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) has been studied extensively for its anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective actions. The lipidic nature and large particle size of PEA in the native state may limit its solubility and bioavailability when given orally, however. Micronized formulations of a drug enhance its rate of dissolution and reduce variability of absorption when orally administered. The present study was thus designed to evaluate the oral anti-inflammatory efficacy of micronized/ultramicronized versus nonmicronized PEA formulations. Methods Micronized/ultramicronized PEA was produced by the air-jet milling technique, and the various PEA preparations were subjected to physicochemical characterization to determine particle size distribution and purity. Each PEA formulation was then assessed for its anti-inflammatory effects when given orally in the carrageenan-induced rat paw model of inflammation, a well-established paradigm of edema formation and thermal hyperalgesia. Results Intraplantar injection of carrageenan into the right hind paw led to a marked accumulation of infiltrating inflammatory cells and increased myeloperoxidase activity. Both parameters were significantly decreased by orally given micronized PEA (PEA-m; 10 mg/kg) or ultramicronized PEA (PEA-um; 10 mg/kg), but not nonmicronized PeaPure (10 mg/kg). Further, carrageenan-induced paw edema and thermal hyperalgesia were markedly and significantly reduced by oral treatment with micronized PEA-m and ultramicronized PEA-um at each time point compared to nonmicronized PeaPure. However, when given by the intraperitoneal route, all PEA formulations proved effective. Conclusions These findings illustrate the superior anti-inflammatory action exerted by orally administered, micronized PEA-m and ultramicronized PEA-um, versus that of nonmicronized PeaPure, in the rat paw carrageenan model of inflammatory pain.
机译:背景技术脂肪酸酰胺棕榈酰乙醇酰胺(PEA)的抗炎和神经保护作用已得到广泛研究。天然状态下,PEA的脂质性质和大粒径可能会限制口服时的溶解度和生物利用度。当口服给药时,药物的微粉化制剂可提高其溶出度并减少吸收变化。因此,本研究旨在评估微粉化/超微粉化与非微粉化PEA制剂的口服抗炎功效。方法采用气流粉碎技术制备微粉/超微粉PEA,并对各种PEA制剂进行理化鉴定,以确定粒径分布和纯度。然后在角叉菜胶诱导的大鼠爪炎症模型,水肿形成和热痛觉过敏范例中口服时,评估每种PEA制剂的抗炎作用。结果向右后爪足底注射角叉菜胶会导致浸润性炎症细胞明显积聚,并增加髓过氧化物酶活性。口服微粉化的PEA(PEA-m; 10 mg / kg)或超微粉化的PEA(PEA-um; 10 mg / kg)显着降低了这两个参数,但未微粉化的PeaPure(10 mg / kg)没有显着降低这两个参数。此外,与未微粉化的PeaPure相比,在每个时间点通过口服微粉化PEA-m和超微粉化PEA-um进行角叉菜胶诱发的爪水肿和热痛觉过敏显着并显着降低。然而,当通过腹膜内途径给予时,所有PEA制剂被证明是有效的。结论这些发现表明,在大鼠爪角叉菜胶炎性疼痛模型中,口服,微粉化的PEA-m和超微粉化的PEA-um优于非微粉化的PeaPure具有抗炎作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号