首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Natural Sciences Research >An Evaluation of Biochemical Composition of Beef, Mutton and Fish Seasoned With Iyere (Allium Sativum) Uziza (Piper Guineense), Eru (Xylopia Aethiopicum) and Ariwo (Manodoro Myristica)
【24h】

An Evaluation of Biochemical Composition of Beef, Mutton and Fish Seasoned With Iyere (Allium Sativum) Uziza (Piper Guineense), Eru (Xylopia Aethiopicum) and Ariwo (Manodoro Myristica)

机译:牛肉,羊肉和鱼类生化成分的评估,这些牛肉,羊肉和鱼用伊莱尔(Allium Sativum)乌齐扎(Piper Guineense),埃鲁(Xylopia Aethiopicum)和阿里沃(Manodoro Myristica)调味

获取原文
           

摘要

The study evaluated the biochemical and antinutrient composition of beef, mutton and fish seasoned with Iyere (allium sativum), Uziza (piper guineese), Eru (xylopia aethiopicum) and Ariwo (manodoro myristica). The samples were classified as follows: Sample A=Beef with Iyere Uziza, Eru, Ariwo; Sample B =Mutton with Iyere, Uziza, Eru, and Ariwo and Sample C= Fish with Iyere, Uziza, Eru and Airiwo. After subjecting the samples to chemical analysis, it was later analyzed statistically with samples T-test. The results obtained from the comparative analysis of chemical and antinutrients composition of spiced and unspiced samples (beef, mutton and fish) showed that out of chemical and antinutrients composition of the spiced and unspiced samples, mutton seemed to be the most resistant to spice effect. This might not be unconnected to the high fat content of mutton that does not absorb liquid content easily. Spicing of mutton therefore requires special adjustment to get the desired effect. Besides, the analysis of the antinutrient composition of the spiced beef, mutton and fish revealed the side effect of application of spices on the samples (i.e. beef, mutton and fish). Across all the antinutrient components (i.e. Phytate, Oxalate and Tannin), there was positive mean difference which indicates that the antinutrient composition of the spiced beef, mutton and fish is higher than that of the unspiced samples. Keywords: Indigenous spices, beef, mutton, fish, biochemical & antinutrient composition.
机译:该研究评估了用伊尔(alium sativum),乌兹萨(pigu guineese),埃鲁(xylopia aethiopicum)和阿里沃(manodoro myristica)调味的牛肉,羊肉和鱼的生化和抗营养成分。样品分类如下:样品A =带有伊尔·乌兹扎,伊鲁,阿里沃的牛肉;样本B =带有伊耶尔,Uziza,Eru和Ariwo的羊肉,而样本C =带有伊耶尔,Uziza,Eru和Airiwo的鱼。对样品进行化学分析后,随后用样品T检验进行统计学分析。从加香料和未加香料的样品(牛肉,羊肉和鱼类)的化学和抗营养成分组成的比较分析中获得的结果表明,在加香料和未加香料的样品的化学和抗营养成分中,羊肉似乎对香料作用的抵抗力最大。这可能与羊肉中脂肪含量高而不容易吸收液体含量无关。因此,对羊肉加香料需要进行特殊调整才能获得理想的效果。此外,对五香牛肉,羊肉和鱼的抗营养成分的分析揭示了在样品(牛肉,羊肉和鱼)上加香料的副作用。在所有抗营养成分(即植酸盐,草酸盐和单宁酸)中,均值存在正差异,这表明五香牛肉,羊肉和鱼类的抗营养成分高于未加香料的样品。关键字:土著香料,牛肉,羊肉,鱼,生化和抗营养成分。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号