首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Modern Transportation >Comparative analysis on dynamic behavior of two HMA railway substructures
【24h】

Comparative analysis on dynamic behavior of two HMA railway substructures

机译:两种HMA铁路子结构动力特性的对比分析

获取原文
           

摘要

A numerical analysis using a finite element program was performed on three structures: hot mix asphalt (HMA) reinforced trackbed (RACS-1), HMA directly supported trackbed (RACS-2), and traditional Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) slab track (SlabTrack). Although the comprehensive dynamic responses of RACS-1 were similar with SlabTrack, HMA layer can positively affect the stress distributions. In particular, the horizontal stresses indicate that the resilience of RACS-1 was improved relative to SlabTrack. In addition, HMA reinforced substructure has the capacity to recover the residual vertical deformation. The effective depth for weakening dynamic loadings is mainly from 0 to 2 m, this being especially true at 0.5 m. The results from the analysis show that HMA is a suitable material for the railway substructure to enhance resilient performance, improve the stress distribution, weaken dynamic loading, and lower the vibration, especially at the effective depth of 2 m. The HMA constructed at the top of the stone subbase layer allows the vertical modulus a smooth transition. In terms of the comprehensive dynamic behaviors, RACS-1 is better than SlabTrack, while the results for RACS-2 are inconclusive and require further research.
机译:使用有限元程序对三种结构进行了数值分析:热拌沥青(HMA)增强履带(RACS-1),HMA直接支撑履带(RACS-2)和传统的波特兰水泥混凝土(PCC)平板轨道(SlabTrack) )。尽管RACS-1的综合动力响应与SlabTrack相似,但是HMA层可以积极地影响应力分布。特别是,水平应力表明RACS-1的回弹力相对于SlabTrack有所提高。另外,HMA加固的子结构具有恢复残余垂直变形的能力。减弱动态载荷的有效深度主要是0到2 m,尤其是在0.5 m处。分析结果表明,HMA是铁路子结构的一种合适材料,可以增强弹性性能,改善应力分布,减弱动态载荷并降低振动,特别是在有效深度2 m处。在石材底层层顶部构造的HMA允许垂直模量平滑过渡。在综合动力学行为方面,RACS-1优于SlabTrack,而RACS-2的结果尚无定论,需要进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号